Achieving CO 2 emission control while keeping electricity prices competitive is one of the most important economic and technical challenges. The strategy for lowering the CO 2 emission from the coal-based power plants includes first of all raising electricity generation efficiency. Currently, steam temperatures in ultra-supercritical (USC) power plants are limited to approximately 627oC by the use of the most advanced commercially available ferritic steels. To go to higher temperatures, high-nickel alloys must be used. The nickel alloys are at an advanced stage of development and are expected to be available to support construction of a demonstration plant in Europe in 2021. For pulverized coal (PC) plants the development means progressing to advanced ultra-supercritical (A-USC) steam conditions - 35MPa/700/720oC. It turned out that the concept consists in gradually raising the live steam temperature and pressure can become economically unjustified. Cost-effectiveness of new investments can be provided only by a significant increase in the efficiency of electricity generation. In the paper the economic evaluation of 900 MW PC unit is presented. The main aim is to compare the cost of electricity generation in USC (28MPa/600/620oC) and A-USC (35MPa/700/720oC) power unit. The variants with CO 2 capture installation by chemical absorption MEA are considered. Compared to a USC design, the capital cost of the A-USC PC plant will be higher, but the operating cost will be lower. Because of the higher efficiency of the A-USC plant, the differential in operating cost increases as fuel price increases and CO 2 cost charges are included.
[1]
Sławomir Dykas,et al.
Calculation of an advanced ultra-supercritical power unit with CO2 capture installation
,
2013
.
[2]
Katarzyna Stępczyńska,et al.
Calculation of a 900 MW conceptual 700/720ºC coal-fired power unit with an auxiliary extraction-backpressure turbine
,
2012
.
[3]
F. Vettraino,et al.
The Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - IEA-NEA Report - 2010 Edition
,
2010
.
[4]
John Davison,et al.
Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2
,
2007
.
[5]
Sławomir Dykas,et al.
Operation of a conceptual A-USC power unit integrated with CO2 capture installation at part load
,
2013
.
[6]
H. Auracher.
Thermal design and optimization
,
1996
.
[7]
Henryk Łukowicz,et al.
Obliczenia ultra-nadkrytycznego bloku węglowego o mocy 900 MW z odzyskiem ciepła ze spalin
,
2012
.