Abstract This paper presents a procedure of modeling uncertainties in the spectral fatigue analysis of offshore structures with reference to the reliability assessment. Uncertainties of the fatigue damage are generally embedded in response characteristics of the stress process and the damage-model used. Besides commonly accepted uncertainties in offshore structural analysis, which are associated with the modeling of structures and the random wave environment, there are also uncertainties arising from joint flexibilities that occur during the response, the wave–current and water–structure interactions. Uncertainties in joint flexibilities are associated with degradation of member connectivities during a response process. Uncertainties introduced by the wave–current interaction are related to the modeling of a random sea state, applied wave loads and water–structure interaction effects in general. The water–structure interaction, which is an important phenomenon to be considered in the analysis of dynamic-sensitive structures, introduces some added hydrodynamic damping. The associated uncertainties are reflected in the response analysis via the damping term. Therefore, in a quasi-static response analysis, these uncertainties disappear. In the spectral fatigue damage, in addition to the uncertainties of stress statistical characteristics there are some other uncertainties associating with the damage-model used. These uncertainties are related to experimentally determined fatigue data and configurations of selected joints at which damages are likely to occur due to high stress concentrations. This paper presents these uncertainty issues with emphasis on the application of a reliability assessment. However, some other uncertainties arise from approximations inherent in the model. They are assumed to be either comparatively negligible or can be considered within the current uncertainty models so that they are not treated further in this paper. In the calculation of the fatigue damage, a non-narrow banded stress process is used.
[1]
Dong-Guen Lee,et al.
Efficient seismic analysis of piping systems with joint deformations
,
1993
.
[2]
A. Anonymus,et al.
Rationalisation of safety and serviceability factors in structural codes
,
1977
.
[3]
Jianping Ma,et al.
An equivalent element representing local flexibility of tubular joints in structural analysis of offshore platforms
,
1993
.
[4]
Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.
Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications
,
1982
.
[5]
Yukio Ueda,et al.
An Improved Joint Model and Equations for Flexibility of Tubular Joints
,
1990
.
[6]
Paul H. Wirsching,et al.
Fatigue under Wide Band Random Stresses
,
1980
.
[7]
R. Rackwitz,et al.
Structural reliability under combined random load sequences
,
1978
.
[8]
C. Brebbia,et al.
Dynamic analysis of offshore structures
,
1979
.
[9]
N. Barltrop,et al.
Dynamics of Fixed Marine Structures
,
1991
.
[10]
Robert E. Melchers,et al.
Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction
,
1987
.
[11]
Halil Karadeniz.
An improved fatigue analysis for offshore structures
,
1991
.
[12]
Norden E. Huang,et al.
Interactions between Steady Won-Uniform Currents and Gravity Waves with Applications for Current Measurements
,
1972
.
[13]
N. Lind,et al.
Fast probability integration by three-parameter normal tail approximation
,
1982
.