Disentangling Gravitational, Environmental, and Egocentric Reference Frames in Spatial Neglect

Previous studies in neglect patients using rotation of the body around the roll-axis revealed neglect of visual stimuli not only in the egocentric, body-centered left but also in the environmental left. The latter has been taken as evidence for a gravity-based environment-centered component of neglect occurring independently of the subject's actual body orientation. However, by using visual stimuli in a normally lightened room, the studies confounded the gravitational upright with the visible upright of the surround. Thus, it is possible that the visible upright of the environment may have served the role of the gravitational upright relative to which neglect occurred. The present experiment evaluated the influence of gravity on contralateral neglect when no visual information was presented. In complete darkness, neglect patients' exploratory eye movements were recorded in five experimental conditions: body in normal upright position, body tilted 30 to the left and 30 to the right, and body pitched 30 backward and 30 forward. In the upright orientation, the patients with neglect showed a bias of ocular exploration to the ipsilesional right side. In egocentric body coordinates, we found no significant differences between the orientation of the biased search field in the different experimental conditions showing that the search field shifted with the orientation of the body. No significant decrease or enhancement of neglect was observed when body orientation was varied in the different conditions. In conclusion, the present results revealed that the modulation of gravitational forces has no significant influence on the exploratory bias of these patients. When visual information was excluded and only graviceptive information was available, the patients' failure to explore the contralesional part of space appeared purely body-centered. The results argue against a disturbed representation of space in neglect that encodes locations in a gravity-based reference system.

[1]  D. Levine,et al.  Left visual spatial neglect is both environment‐centered and body‐centered , 1987, Neurology.

[2]  G Westheimer,et al.  The ocular tilt reaction--a brainstem oculomotor routine. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[3]  J. Jackson.  Case of a large cerebral tumour without optic neuritis and with left hemiplegia and imperception , 1996 .

[4]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  The Spatial Features of Unilateral Neglect , 1997 .

[5]  A. Pick.  Beiträge zur Pathologie und pathologische Anatomie des Zentralnervensystems: Mit Bemerkungen zur normalen Anatomie desselben , 1898 .

[6]  H C Diener,et al.  On the role of vestibular, visual and somatosensory information for dynamic postural control in humans. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[7]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  E. Làdavas,et al.  Is the hemispatial deficit produced by right parietal lobe damage associated with retinal or gravitational coordinates? , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  J. Hornak,et al.  Ocular exploration in the dark by patients with visual neglect , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  T. Brandt,et al.  Pathological eye-head coordination in roll: tonic ocular tilt reaction in mesencephalic and medullary lesions. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  A new multiaxis rotating chair for oculomotor and vestibular function testing in humans , 1996 .

[12]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[13]  R. Rafal,et al.  Axis-based neglect of visual shapes , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Object-Centered Neglect in Patients with Unilateral Neglect: Effects of Left-Right Coordinates of Objects , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect , 1990 .

[16]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[17]  K M Heilman,et al.  A comparison of the influences of body and environment centred reference frames on neglect. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  H. Karnath,et al.  Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  G. Vallar,et al.  Gravity and hemineglect , 1995, Neuroreport.

[22]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  'What' and 'Where' in Visual Attention: Evidence from the Neglect Syndrome , 1992 .