Foci and correlates of organizational identification

Adopting the social identity perspective on organizational identification proposed by Ashforth and Mael (1989), the present study tested two hypotheses concerning the importance of work-group identification (WID) relative to organizational identification (OID). WID was predicted to be stronger than OID as well as more predictive of organizational attitudes and behaviour. Data about employees’ WID, OID, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, job involvement, and job motivation from two samples (N = 76 and N = 163) supported these predictions. We conclude that our understanding of organizational attitudes and behaviour has much to gain by an open eye for the multiple foci of identification that are associated with organizational membership, and that managerial practice may benefit from an increased focus on the work group.

[1]  Gary Blau,et al.  Influence of Group Lateness on Individual Lateness: A Cross-Level Examination , 1995 .

[2]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  LOYAL FROM DAY ONE: BIODATA, ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION, AND TURNOVER AMONG NEWCOMERS , 1995 .

[3]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[4]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  Profiles of commitment: An empirical test , 1993 .

[5]  M. Brewer,et al.  The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behaviour. , 1993 .

[6]  Paula C. Morrow,et al.  The theory and measurement of work commitment , 1993 .

[7]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[8]  Thomas E. Becker.  Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making? , 1992 .

[9]  James K. Beggan.  On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. , 1992 .

[10]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[11]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[12]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[13]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[14]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  Contrasting group and organizational commitment: Evidence for differences among multilevel attachments , 1989 .

[15]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[16]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[17]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[18]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[19]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[20]  William H. Mobley,et al.  Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. , 1977 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[22]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[23]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organizational type. , 1972 .

[24]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification , 1971 .

[25]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[26]  Michael E. Brown.  Identification and Some Conditions of Organizational Involvement , 1969 .

[27]  Brayfield,et al.  an Index of Job Satisfaction. , 1954 .