Proceedings of the Seventh International Natural Language Generation Conference

Some people with disabilities find it difficult to access some forms of language. Assistive Technology is a term used to describe a class of technologies/interventions designed to enable people with disabilities to do things that their disabilitie currently make difficult. A large amount of work on Assistive Technology has focused on enabling access to language and communication; this class of interventions could greatly benefit from Natural Language Generation technologies. This talk will briefly survey some Assistive Technology applications that have employed Natural Language Generation technologies – highlighting some of the needs in this application area along with the opportunities that it provides for investigating hard problems in Natural Language Generation. It will then highlight a project, called the SIGHT System, intended to provide access to information graphics (e.g., bar charts, line graphs) found in popular media to people who have visual impairments. This system employs Natural Language Generation technologies to generate appropriate textual summaries of the information graphics. As such, it makes contributions to several areas within the field of Natural Language Generation while also enabling access to the information in these graphics to people who cannot access it with visual means.

[1]  Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.  Verbalizing OWL in Attempto Controlled English , 2007, OWLED.

[2]  Tod Jay Allman,et al.  The translator's assistant: A multilingual natural language generator based on linguistic universals, typologies, and primitives , 2011 .

[3]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  In situ migration of handcrafted ontologies to reason-able forms , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..

[4]  Maxine Eskénazi,et al.  A Finite-State Turn-Taking Model for Spoken Dialog Systems , 2009, NAACL.

[5]  J. Fleiss.  Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[6]  Steve J. Young,et al.  Partially observable Markov decision processes for spoken dialog systems , 2007, Comput. Speech Lang..

[7]  Wolfgang Finkler,et al.  Incremental generation for real-time applications , 1995 .

[8]  Richard Power,et al.  Levels of organisation in ontology verbalisation , 2011, ENLG.

[9]  Anja Belz,et al.  Automatic generation of weather forecast texts using comprehensive probabilistic generation-space models , 2008, Natural Language Engineering.

[10]  Luigi Iannone,et al.  Enriching the Gene Ontology via the Dissection of Labels Using the Ontology Pre-processor Language , 2010, EKAW.

[11]  Mira Ariel.  Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[12]  Hulstijn.  THE GRAMMAR OF DISCOURSE , 2010 .

[13]  Richard Power,et al.  Grouping Axioms for More Coherent Ontology Descriptions , 2010, INLG.

[14]  Oliver Lemon,et al.  Learning to Adapt to Unknown Users: Referring Expression Generation in Spoken Dialogue Systems , 2010, ACL.

[15]  Aarne Ranta.  Type-Theoretical Grammar , 1995 .

[16]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue , 2004 .

[17]  Richard Power,et al.  Optimizing Referential Coherence in Text Generation , 2004, CL.

[18]  Yoav Goldberg,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Easy-First Non-Directional Dependency Parsing , 2010, NAACL.

[19]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[20]  Nina Dethlefs,et al.  Combining Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning and Bayesian Networks for Natural Language Generation in Situated Dialogue , 2011, ENLG.

[21]  Richard Power,et al.  Complexity Assumptions in Ontology Verbalisation , 2010, ACL.

[22]  David DeVault,et al.  Can I Finish? Learning When to Respond to Incremental Interpretation Results in Interactive Dialogue , 2009, SIGDIAL Conference.

[23]  Kees van Deemter.  What Game Theory Can Do for NLG: The Case of Vague Language (Invited Talk) , 2009, ENLG.

[24]  Nina Dethlefs,et al.  Optimising Natural Language Generation Decision Making For Situated Dialogue , 2011, SIGDIAL Conference.

[25]  Aarne Ranta,et al.  The GF Resource Grammar Library , 2009 .

[26]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .

[27]  A. S. Hein.  Definite NPs and background knowledge in medical text , 1989 .

[28]  Pascal Hitzler.  Ontology Design Patterns: Some key ideas , 2014 .

[29]  Kaarel Kaljurand,et al.  Attempto Controlled English for Knowledge Representation , 2008, Reasoning Web.

[30]  Richard Power,et al.  Expressing OWL axioms by English sentences: dubious in theory, feasible in practice , 2010, COLING.

[31]  David Schlangen,et al.  Evaluation and Optimisation of Incremental Processors , 2011, Dialogue Discourse.

[32]  Gabriel Skantze,et al.  A General, Abstract Model of Incremental Dialogue Processing , 2011 .

[33]  Sanda M. Harabagiu,et al.  Multilingual Coreference Resolution , 2000, ANLP.

[34]  Paul R. Smart,et al.  Controlled Natural Languages and the Semantic Web , 2008 .

[35]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Formal Semantics , 2020 .

[36]  E. Prince.  The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[37]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[38]  Gabriel Skantze,et al.  Towards Incremental Speech Generation in Dialogue Systems , 2010, SIGDIAL Conference.

[39]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Interchanging lexical resources on the Semantic Web , 2012, Language Resources and Evaluation.

[40]  András Kornai,et al.  HunPos: an open source trigram tagger , 2007, ACL 2007.

[41]  Aarne Ranta,et al.  Grammatical Framework , 2004, Journal of Functional Programming.

[42]  Rashmi Prasad,et al.  Constraints on the generation of referring expressions, with special reference to hindi , 2003 .

[43]  Robert Stevens,et al.  Automating generation of textual class definitions from OWL to English , 2011, J. Biomed. Semant..

[44]  Milica Gasic,et al.  Phrase-Based Statistical Language Generation Using Graphical Models and Active Learning , 2010, ACL.

[45]  Regina Barzilay,et al.  Catching the Drift: Probabilistic Content Models, with Applications to Generation and Summarization , 2004, NAACL.

[46]  Joakim Nivre,et al.  MaltParser: A Language-Independent System for Data-Driven Dependency Parsing , 2007, Natural Language Engineering.

[47]  Rolf Schwitter,et al.  Controlled Natural Language meets the SemanticWeb , 2004, ALTA.

[48]  David Schlangen,et al.  Collaborating on Utterances with a Spoken Dialogue System Using an ISU-based Approach to Incremental Dialogue Management , 2010, SIGDIAL Conference.

[49]  Gabriel Skantze,et al.  Incremental Dialogue Processing in a Micro-Domain , 2009, EACL.

[50]  T. Givón,et al.  Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .

[51]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Centering in Japanese Discourse , 1996, ACL.

[52]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Evaluating Centering for Information Ordering Using Corpora , 2009, CL.

[53]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web , 2004, CIKM '04.

[54]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[55]  Thomas Andreas Meyer,et al.  Sydney OWL Syntax - towards a Controlled Natural Language Syntax for OWL 1.1 , 2007, OWLED.

[56]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  A Methodology to Migrate the Gene Ontology to a Description Logic Environment Using DAML+OIL , 2002, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[57]  Chris Watkins,et al.  Learning from delayed rewards , 1989 .

[58]  冯利芳.  Facebook , 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[59]  Kathleen McKeown,et al.  Text generation: using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text , 1985 .

[60]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Semantic and lexical universals : theory and empirical findings , 1994 .

[61]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Trainable Sentence Planning for Complex Information Presentations in Spoken Dialog Systems , 2004, ACL.

[62]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .