Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND Radiographs are the standard clinical tool used to monitor patients with pelvic osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty; however, previous reports have questioned the value and accuracy of this method. With use of a cadaveric model, we investigated the accuracy of radiographs in determining the location and size of periacetabular osteolysis. METHODS We implanted total hip arthroplasty components in eight cadaveric hips and made four radiographs of each hip from different views. We then removed the components and created two pelvic defects in each hip. We measured the volume of each defect, reimplanted the components, and made another set of radiographs. The defects were then enlarged two more times, with the volume measured and another set of radiographs made each time. In total, 128 radiographs were made of forty-eight lesions. An orthopaedist who was blinded to the location of the lesions assessed the radiographs with regard to the presence and size of osteolytic lesions. RESULTS The overall sensitivity for the detection of osteolysis on a single radiograph was 41.5%, and the overall specificity was 93.0%. Sensitivity was dependent on the location and size of the lesions but not on the radiographic view. Sensitivity ranged from 72% for lesions in the ilium to </=15% for lesions in the ischium and acetabular rim. The detection rate for lesions with a volume of >10 cm (3) was significantly higher than that for smaller lesions (p < 0.001). When all four radiographic views of one lesion were analyzed together, sensitivity increased to 73.6%. Despite the low sensitivity, specificity remained high, indicating that once osteolysis is evident radiographically, the likelihood that a lesion truly exists is high. Additionally, we found that the extent of osteolysis was substantially underestimated on radiographs. CONCLUSIONS The use of radiographs to assess and monitor osteolysis has both limitations and merits. Using multiple views, an experienced orthopaedist identified only 73.6% of pelvic lesions. However, once a pelvic osteolytic lesion is evident radiographically, the likelihood that it truly exists is high.

[1]  C. Engh,et al.  The Influence of Clinical Factors on Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  W H Harris,et al.  Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: the problem. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  C J Sutherland,et al.  Preoperative description of severe acetabular defects caused by failed total hip replacement. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  W H Harris,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  J O Galante,et al.  Fixation, polyethylene wear, and pelvic osteolysis in primary total hip replacement. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  W. Capello,et al.  Omnifit cementless total hip arthroplasty. A 10-year average followup. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  C. Engh,et al.  Pattern of osteolysis around two different cementless metal-backed cups: retrospective, radiographic analysis at minimum 10-year follow-up. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  T. Glant,et al.  Osteolysis: basic science. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  B. Kiratli,et al.  Determination of bone mineral density by dual X‐ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  C. Engh,et al.  Long-Term Results Using the Anatomic Medullary Locking Hip Prosthesis , 2001, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[11]  S David Stulberg,et al.  Use of Helical Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Acetabular Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  W. Lew,et al.  Improving the detection of acetabular osteolysis using oblique radiographs. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  T. Fehring,et al.  Underestimation of pelvic osteolysis: the value of the iliac oblique radiograph. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  D. Berry.  Management of osteolysis around total hip arthroplasty. , 1999, Orthopedics.

[16]  C. Engh,et al.  Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  W. Bargar,et al.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  H. Bertram,et al.  Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  H. Svanholm,et al.  Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic , 1989, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[20]  C. Engh,et al.  Severe osteolysis of the pelvic in association with acetabular replacement without cement. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  B. Masri,et al.  Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  W. Harris,et al.  Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.