Evidence for a bimodal distribution of Escherichia coli doubling times below a threshold initial cell concentration

BackgroundIn the process of developing a microplate-based growth assay, we discovered that our test organism, a native E. coli isolate, displayed very uniform doubling times (τ) only up to a certain threshold cell density. Below this cell concentration (≤ 100 -1,000 CFU mL-1 ; ≤ 27-270 CFU well-1) we observed an obvious increase in the τ scatter.ResultsWorking with a food-borne E. coli isolate we found that τ values derived from two different microtiter platereader-based techniques (i.e., optical density with growth time {=OD[t]} fit to the sigmoidal Boltzmann equation or time to calculated 1/2-maximal OD {=tm} as a function of initial cell density {=tm[CI]}) were in excellent agreement with the same parameter acquired from total aerobic plate counting. Thus, using either Luria-Bertani (LB) or defined (MM) media at 37°C, τ ranged between 17-18 (LB) or 51-54 (MM) min. Making use of such OD[t] data we collected many observations of τ as a function of manifold initial or starting cell concentrations (CI). We noticed that τ appeared to be distributed in two populations (bimodal) at low CI. When CI ≤100 CFU mL-1 (stationary phase cells in LB), we found that about 48% of the observed τ values were normally distributed around a mean (μτ1) of 18 ± 0.68 min (± στ1) and 52% with μτ2 = 20 ± 2.5 min (n = 479). However, at higher starting cell densities (CI>100 CFU mL-1), the τ values were distributed unimodally (μτ = 18 ± 0.71 min; n = 174). Inclusion of a small amount of ethyl acetate to the LB caused a collapse of the bimodal to a unimodal form. Comparable bimodal τ distribution results were also observed using E. coli cells diluted from mid-log phase cultures. Similar results were also obtained when using either an E. coli O157:H7 or a Citrobacter strain. When sterile-filtered LB supernatants, which formerly contained relatively low concentrations of bacteria(1,000-10,000 CFU mL-1), were employed as a diluent, there was an evident shift of the two populations towards each other but the bimodal effect was still apparent using either stationary or log phase cells.ConclusionThese data argue that there is a dependence of growth rate on starting cell density.

[1]  J. Brewster,et al.  A simple micro-growth assay for enumerating bacteria. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[2]  J. Brouillette,et al.  Calculation of immobilized enzyme reaction progress curves from nested ordered-sequential rate expressions , 1999 .

[3]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Statistical evaluation of mathematical models for microbial growth. , 2004, International journal of food microbiology.

[4]  A. Ballagi,et al.  Observing Growth and Division of Large Numbers of Individual Bacteria by Image Analysis , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  L. Guillier,et al.  Influence of Stress on Individual Lag Time Distributions of Listeria monocytogenes , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  A. Gehring,et al.  Blocking nonspecific adsorption of native food-borne microorganisms by immunomagnetic beads with iota-carrageenan. , 2004, Carbohydrate research.

[7]  Gordon W Niven,et al.  A novel method for measuring lag times in division of individual bacterial cells using image analysis. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[8]  A. Gehring,et al.  Minimum detectable level of Salmonellae using a binomial-based bacterial ice nucleation detection assay (BIND). , 2000, Journal of AOAC International.

[9]  Curve fitting in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Illustrative examples using a spreadsheet and microcomputer , 1994 .

[10]  A. Gehring,et al.  IMMUNO‐MAGNETIC BEAD MASS TRANSPORT AND CAPTURE EFFICIENCY AT LOW TARGET CELL DENSITIES IN PHOSPHATE‐BUFFERED SALINE1 , 2002 .

[11]  Thomas E Oscar,et al.  Validation of Lag Time and Growth Rate Models for Salmonella Typhimurium: Acceptable Prediction Zone Method , 2005 .

[12]  József Baranyi,et al.  Distribution of turbidity detection times produced by single cell-generated bacterial populations. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[13]  J. Augustin,et al.  Automated image analysis of bacterial colony growth as a tool to study individual lag time distributions of immobilized cells. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[14]  Zoltán Kutalik,et al.  Connection between stochastic and deterministic modelling of microbial growth. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  P. Irwin,et al.  A 6×6 drop plate method for simultaneous colony counting and MPN enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli , 2003 .

[16]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch , 2004, Science.

[17]  K. Willecke,et al.  Biophysical properties of mouse connexin30 gap junction channels studied in transfected human HeLa cells , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  S. Quake,et al.  Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat , 2005, Science.

[19]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[20]  P. Irwin,et al.  Binding of nontarget microorganisms from food washes to anti-Salmonella and anti-E. coli O157 immunomagnetic beads: most probable composition of background Eubacteria , 2008, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.