Non-contrast-enhanced preoperative assessment of lung perfusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer using Fourier decomposition magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE To investigate non-contrast-enhanced Fourier decomposition MRI (FD MRI) for assessment of regional lung perfusion in patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in comparison to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI). METHODS Time-resolved non-contrast-enhanced images of the lungs were acquired prospectively in 15 patients using a 2D balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) sequence. After non-rigid registration of the native image data, perfusion-weighted images were calculated by separating periodic changes of lung proton density at the cardiac frequency using FD. DCE MRI subtraction datasets were acquired as standard of reference. Both datasets were analyzed visually for perfusion defects. Then segmentation analyses were performed to describe perfusion of pulmonary lobes semi-quantitatively as percentages of total lung perfusion. Overall FD MRI perfusion signal was compared to velocity-encoded flow measurements in the pulmonary trunk as an additional fully quantitative reference. RESULTS Image quality ratings of FD MRI were significantly inferior to those of DCE MRI (P<0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FD MRI for visual detection of perfusion defects were 84%, 92%, and 91%. Semi-quantitative evaluation of lobar perfusion provided high agreement between FD MRI and DCE MRI for both entire lungs and upper lobes, but less agreement in the lower parts of both lungs. FD perfusion signal showed high linear correlation with pulmonary arterial blood flow. CONCLUSION FD MRI is a promising technique that allows for assessing regional lung perfusion in NSCLC patients without contrast media or ionizing radiation. However, for being applied in clinical routine, image quality and robustness of the technique need to be further improved.

[1]  M. Lederlin,et al.  Functional MRI using Fourier decomposition of lung signal: reproducibility of ventilation- and perfusion-weighted imaging in healthy volunteers. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Herbert Y Kressel,et al.  Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way? , 2010, Radiology.

[3]  M. Puderbach,et al.  MRI of the lung (1/3): methods , 2012, Insights into Imaging.

[4]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. , 2009, Radiology.

[5]  O. Faugeras,et al.  A variational approach to multi-modal image matching , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods in Computer Vision.

[6]  V. Mai,et al.  MR perfusion imaging of pulmonary parenchyma using pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques: FAIRER and FAIR , 1999 .

[7]  John P Griffin,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). , 2007, Chest.

[8]  R R Edelman,et al.  Quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion with dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  R C Zepp,et al.  Simple steps for improving multiple-reader studies in radiology. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Muers,et al.  Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery , 2005 .

[11]  M. Puderbach,et al.  MRI of the lung (2/3). Why … when … how? , 2012, Insights into Imaging.

[12]  Peter Reimer,et al.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast media: updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines , 2013, European Radiology.

[13]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Assessment of Differential Pulmonary Blood Flow Using Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison With Radionuclide Perfusion Scintigraphy , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Michael Deimling,et al.  Non‐contrast‐enhanced perfusion and ventilation assessment of the human lung by means of fourier decomposition in proton MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Annette Kopp-Schneider,et al.  Morphologic and functional scoring of cystic fibrosis lung disease using MRI. , 2012, European Journal of Radiology.

[16]  M. Lmu Pulmonary ventilation and perfusion imaging with dual-energy CT , 2011 .

[17]  R. Coleman,et al.  Nuclear Medicine Techniques , 2010 .

[18]  Dale L Bailey,et al.  Enhancing lung scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  John F. Murray,et al.  Textbook of Respiratory Medicine , 1988 .

[20]  L. Schad,et al.  Non-Contrast-Enhanced Lung Perfusion MRI In Comparison To Contrast-Enhanced MRI Perfusion In Young Cystic Fibrosis Patients , 2010, Asian Test Symposium.

[21]  T. Dill,et al.  Pulmonary perfusion in acute pulmonary embolism: agreement of MRI and SPECT for lobar, segmental and subsegmental perfusion defects , 2006, Acta radiologica.

[22]  T. British,et al.  BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. , 2001, Thorax.

[23]  M Puderbach,et al.  MR imaging of the chest: a practical approach at 1.5T. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[24]  Grzegorz Bauman,et al.  Pulmonary functional imaging: qualitative comparison of Fourier decomposition MR imaging with SPECT/CT in porcine lung. , 2011, Radiology.