Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention

Abstract Two experiments examined whether accessible goals preconsciously direct selective attention. Goal activation was manipulated by one's goal pursuit being either undermined or affirmed (resulting in an experienced state of either incompleteness or completeness). Attention responses were assessed through a Stroop-like task (Experiment 1) and a response-time task in which participants indicated a stimulus' direction of motion (Experiment 2). Results showed that when goals were accessible, attention was drawn toward goal-relevant items—even when these items were to be ignored and when responses occurred too fast for conscious control. Accessible goals directed implicit cognition (i.e., attention toward stimuli associated with the goal), despite the fact that these goals were not chronically held, but manipulated in the lab.

[1]  G. Moskowitz,et al.  Preconsciously Controlling Stereotyping: Implicitly Activated Egalitarian Goals Prevent the Activation of Stereotypes , 2000 .

[2]  Chris Hawkins,et al.  Motivation to Think and Order Effects in Persuasion: The Moderating Role of Chunking , 2001 .

[3]  P. Devine,et al.  Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice , 1998 .

[4]  B. Zeigarnik.  Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen , 1927 .

[5]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection , 1986 .

[6]  J. Bruner,et al.  Value and need as organizing factors in perception. , 1947, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? , 1989 .

[8]  J. Bargh.  Attention and Automaticity in the Processing of Self-Relevant Information , 1982 .

[9]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[10]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[11]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[12]  J. Bruner,et al.  Personal values as selective factors in perception. , 1948, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Von O. Leirer,et al.  Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation. , 1980 .

[14]  Jens Förster,et al.  Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment : Regulatory focus and the goal looms larger effect , 1998 .

[15]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[16]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Goal Effects on Action and Cognition , 1996 .

[17]  M. Erdelyi.  A new look at the new look: perceptual defense and vigilance. , 1974, Psychological review.

[18]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[19]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[20]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. , 1994 .

[21]  R. Petty,et al.  The need to evaluate. , 1996 .

[22]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions , 1996 .

[23]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Symbolic self-completion , 1982 .

[24]  Christina T. Fong,et al.  Automatic Activation of Stereotypes: The Role of Self-Image Threat , 1998 .

[25]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[26]  E. McGinnies.  Emotionality and perceptual defense. , 1949, Psychological review.

[27]  F. Heider,et al.  Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .

[28]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Preconscious Control of Stereotype Activation Through Chronic Egalitarian Goals , 1999 .

[29]  C. Carver,et al.  Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior , 1981 .

[30]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[31]  E. Klinger,et al.  Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. , 1975 .

[32]  E. Higgins,et al.  Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  G. Moskowitz.  Cognitive social psychology : the Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition , 1981 .

[34]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[35]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[36]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. , 1993 .

[37]  E. C. Cherry.  Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[38]  E. Klinger,et al.  Modes of Normal Conscious Flow , 1978 .

[39]  S. Spencer,et al.  Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others , 1997 .

[40]  Sander L. Koole,et al.  The Cessation of Rumination Through Self-Affirmation , 1999 .

[41]  T. Pittman,et al.  Motivation and cognition: Control deprivation and the nature of subsequent information processing☆ , 1989 .

[42]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .