The burden of reciprocity: Processes of exclusion and withdrawal from personal networks among low-income families

Reciprocity has been traditionally treated in sociological and anthropological theory as a force of integration that keeps network members tied together through a complex web of obligations and interdependencies. This article suggests that in the context of poverty it can be a burden and source of relational stress that leads to the demise of social relationships. It is argued that poverty can make it difficult for individuals to maintain relations with others and participate in social support networks because they do not have many resources to share and reciprocate. Recently published ethnographic studies on the social networks of low-income families in the United States form the basis for a micro-level model linking poverty to social fragmentation. By focusing on the suppressive effect of reciprocity, this model identifies two major emergent mechanisms – exclusion and withdrawal – operating in two realms – material and normative – that are conducive to social fragmentation. This article thus promotes our understanding of the ways in which relational dynamics affect low-income families’ social well-being and contributes methodologically by laying the groundwork for future empirical research.

[1]  No More Kin: Exploring Race, Class, and Gender in Family Networks , 1997 .

[2]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The Social Psychology of the Gift , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  B. Malinowski Argonauts of the Western Pacific , 1922 .

[4]  K. V. Hansen Not-So-Nuclear Families: Class, Gender, and Networks of Care , 2004 .

[5]  P. Bourdieu The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[6]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[7]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[8]  M. Mauss The gift : Forms and functions of exchange in Archaic Societies / Marcel Mauss , 2020 .

[9]  N. Sarkisian,et al.  Kin Support among Blacks and Whites: Race and Family Organization , 2004 .

[10]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  The Black Extended Family , 1978 .

[11]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Judith Hennessy Morality and Work–Family Conflict in the Lives of Poor and Low-Income Women , 2009 .

[13]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Fragile and Resilient Trust: Risk and Uncertainty in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange* , 2009 .

[14]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[15]  Jacquest T. Godbout,et al.  The World of the Gift , 1998 .

[16]  K. V. Hansen The Asking Rules of Reciprocity in Networks of Care for Children , 2004 .

[17]  S. McDaniel,et al.  The risks of being a lone mother on income support in Canada and the USA , 2010 .

[18]  L. McIntyre,et al.  Feeling Poor: The Felt Experience Low-Income Lone Mothers , 2003 .

[19]  M. Nelson Single Mothers and Social Support: The Commitment to, and Retreat from, Reciprocity , 2000 .

[20]  M. Nelson The Social Economy of Single Motherhood: Raising Children in Rural America , 2005 .

[21]  Andrew B. Kipnis,et al.  The Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village , 1996 .

[22]  Silvia Domínguez,et al.  Creating networks for survival and mobility: social capital among African-American and Latin-American low-income mothers , 2003 .

[23]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[24]  Amir Paz-Fuchs Welfare to Work , 2008 .

[25]  Sarah J. Mahler,et al.  American Dreaming: Immigrant Life on the Margins , 1995 .

[26]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[27]  A. Schram,et al.  Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment , 2006 .

[28]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[29]  John Robert Warren,et al.  Socioeconomic Reach and Heterogeneity in the Extended Family: Contours and Consequences , 2000 .

[30]  P. Ekeh,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. , 1975 .

[31]  J. Finch,et al.  Negotiating Family Responsibilities , 1992 .

[32]  Clifford C. Clogg,et al.  The Structure of Intergenerational Exchanges in American Families , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  M. Sims,et al.  Ghettos and Barrios: The Impact of Neighborhood Poverty and Race on Job Matching among Blacks and Latinos , 2001 .

[34]  L. Lomnitz,et al.  Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown , 1977 .

[35]  Barry Wellman,et al.  It's not who you know, it's how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom? , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[36]  Mai B. Phan,et al.  Helping hands: Neighborhood diversity, deprivation, and reciprocity of support in non-kin networks , 2009 .

[37]  Amir Paz-Fuchs Welfare to Work: Conditional Rights in Social Policy , 2008 .

[38]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears: New Implications for Race and Urban Poverty in the Global Economy , 1998, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[39]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[40]  Giving and Social Relations: The Culture of Free Giving and its Differentiation Today , 2003 .

[41]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[42]  Joyce C. Aschenbrenner Lifelines: Black families in Chicago , 1975 .

[43]  Frank Adloff,et al.  Giving Social Ties, Reciprocity in Modern Society , 2006, European Journal of Sociology.

[44]  A. Korteweg The Construction of Gendered Citizenship at the Welfare Office: An Ethnographic Comparison of Welfare-to-Work Workshops in the United States and the Netherlands , 2006 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  V. Keith,et al.  The Social Support of Employed African American and Anglo Mothers , 1995 .

[47]  M. Small,et al.  The Presence of Organizational Resources in Poor Urban Neighborhoods:An Analysis of Average and Contextual Effects , 2006 .

[48]  W. Wilson,et al.  Book Review: When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor , 1997 .

[49]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas , 1993 .

[50]  D. Cheal The Gift Economy , 1988 .

[51]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[52]  Aafke Komter,et al.  Reciprocity as a Principle of Exclusion: Gift giving in the Netherlands , 1996 .

[53]  Z. Bauman The Individualized Society , 2001 .

[54]  Shira Offer,et al.  Barriers to social support among low‐income mothers , 2012 .

[55]  Shira Offer,et al.  The contribution of social support to the material well‐being of low‐income families , 2005 .

[56]  E. Uehara,et al.  Reciprocity Reconsidered: Gouldner's `Moral Norm of Reciprocity' and Social Support , 1995 .

[57]  E. Uehara,et al.  Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  Aafke Komter,et al.  Social Solidarity and the Gift , 2004 .

[59]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .