18S rRNA hyper-elongation and the phylogeny of Euhemiptera (Insecta: Hemiptera).

The small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA (SSU nrRNA), whose sedimentation is mostly 18S in eukaryotes, is considered a relatively conservative marker for resolving phylogenetic relationship at the order level or higher. Length variation in SSU nrDNA is common, and can be rather large in some groups. In studies of Hexapoda phylogeny, the SSU nrDNA has been repeatedly used as a marker. Sternorrhyncha has been rarely included. The lengths of SSU nrDNAs of sternorrhynchids, the basal group of Hemiptera identified in the previous study are 0.3-0.6 kb longer than the usual ones in Hexapoda (1.8-1.9 kb). To use the entire SSU nrDNA sequences or the length-variable parts could cause alignment trouble and therefore affect phylogenetic results, as shown in this study of Euhemiptera phylogeny. Two problems are particularly noticeable. One is that two hyper-variable regions flanking a short length-conservative region could become overlapped in the alignment. This will destroy the positional homology over a larger range. The other is that, when a base pair in a stem of the secondary structure is located near the length-variable regions (LVRs), the simultaneous positional homology of these two bases in the pair is always lost in the alignment results. In this study, the secondary structure model of Hexapoda SSU nrRNA was slightly adjusted and the LVR distributions in it were finely positioned. The noise caused by the hyper LVRs was eliminated and the simultaneous homology for the paired bases was recovered based on the secondary structure model. These corrections improved the quality of the data matrix and hence improved the resolving behavior of the algorithm used. This study provided more convincing evidence for resolving the Euhemiptera suborders phylogeny as (Archaeorrhyncha+(Clypeorrhyncha+(Coleorrhyncha+Heteroptera))). This result provided a more solid background for outgroup determination according to the phylogenetic studies inside each suborder. The problems caused by LVRs have seldom been well addressed. As phylogenetic reconstruction depends more on the data matrix itself than on the algorithm, and length variation of SSU/LSU rRNA exists more or less in any group, it is necessary to closely investigate the effect of rRNA length variation on alignment and phylogenetic reconstruction in more groups.

[1]  Qiang Xie,et al.  The Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rRNA sequences from the main lineages of Trichophora (Insecta: Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha). , 2005, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[2]  S. B. Needleman,et al.  A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  A. Meyer,et al.  Patterns of nucleotide change in mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes and the phylogeny of piranhas , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[4]  R. Gutell,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of molluscan mitochondrial LSU rDNA sequences and secondary structures. , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[5]  W. Wheeler,et al.  Cladistic relationships among higher groups of Heteroptera: congruence between morphological and molecular data sets , 1993 .

[6]  M. Whiting,et al.  Mantophasmatodea and phylogeny of the lower neopterous insects , 2005 .

[7]  Christina Waldsich,et al.  RNA folding in vivo. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  N. B. Petrov,et al.  Secondary structure of some elements of 18S rRNA suggests that strongylid and a part of rhabditid nematodes are monophyletic , 1998, FEBS letters.

[9]  F. Sperling,et al.  The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel. , 2000, Annual review of entomology.

[10]  Yves Van de Peer,et al.  Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA structures , 1993, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  R. Gutell,et al.  Collection of small subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1994. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[13]  L. Kimsey,et al.  18S rDNA sequences and the holometabolous insects. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[14]  T. Henry Phylogenetic Analysis of Family Groups within the Infraorder Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), with Emphasis on the Lygaeoidea , 1997 .

[15]  W. Brown,et al.  Rates and patterns of base change in the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene. , 1993, Genetics.

[16]  N. Moran,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of the homoptera: a paraphyletic taxon , 1995, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  W. Wheeler OPTIMIZATION ALIGNMENT: THE END OF MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT IN PHYLOGENETICS? , 1996 .

[18]  J. Martín,et al.  Performance of 18S rDNA helix E23 for phylogenetic relationships within and between the Rotifera-Acanthocephala clades. , 2000, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[19]  Yan P. Yuan,et al.  HGBASE: a database of SNPs and other variations in and around human genes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  James B. Munro,et al.  A secondary structural model of the 28S rRNA expansion segments D2 and D3 for Chalcidoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..

[22]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[23]  W C Wheeler,et al.  Elision: a method for accommodating multiple molecular sequence alignments with alignment-ambiguous sites. , 1995, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[24]  R. Gutell,et al.  Comparative anatomy of 16-S-like ribosomal RNA. , 1985, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[25]  Y. Roisin,et al.  Generic Revision of the Smaller Nasute Termites of the Greater Antilles (Isoptera, Termitidae, Nasutitermitinae) , 1996 .

[26]  E. Zimmer,et al.  Systematics of holometabolous insect orders based on 18S ribosomal RNA. , 1993, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[27]  Z. Yang On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[28]  D Gautheret,et al.  Predicting U-turns in ribosomal RNA with comparative sequence analysis. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  R. Gutell,et al.  The accuracy of ribosomal RNA comparative structure models. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  M J Telford,et al.  The phylogenetic affinities of the chaetognaths: a molecular analysis. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  R. Jenner The scientific status of metazoan cladistics: why current research practice must change , 2004 .

[32]  James M. Carpenter,et al.  The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[33]  D. Penny,et al.  Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  R. de Wachter,et al.  18S rRNA data indicate that Aschelminthes are polyphyletic in origin and consist of at least three distinct clades. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  B. Campbell,et al.  Evolutionary origin of whiteflies (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences , 1994, Insect molecular biology.

[37]  J. Huelsenbeck,et al.  Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. , 1992, The Journal of heredity.

[38]  George E. Fox,et al.  Database of non-canonical base pairs found in known RNA structures , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  D. Turner,et al.  Incorporating chemical modification constraints into a dynamic programming algorithm for prediction of RNA secondary structure. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Modelling the secondary structures of slippage-prone hypervariable RNA regions: the example of the tiger beetle 18S rRNA variable region V4. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  W C Wheeler,et al.  The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[42]  J. T. Sorensen,et al.  Paraphyly of Homoptera and Auchenorrhyncha inferred from 18S rDNA nucleotide sequences , 1995 .

[43]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Structure of a bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit at 5.5 Å resolution , 1999, Nature.

[44]  Randall T. Schuh,et al.  True bugs of the world (Hemiptera:Heteroptera) : classification and natural history , 1995 .

[45]  J. Cryan Molecular phylogeny of Cicadomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadoidea, Cercopoidea and Membracoidea): adding evidence to the controversy , 2005 .

[46]  K. Kjer,et al.  Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: an example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. , 1995, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[47]  A. Bezděk,et al.  Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[48]  T. Bourgoin,et al.  18S rRNA secondary structure and phylogenetic position of Peloridiidae (Insecta, hemiptera). , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[49]  U. Hwang,et al.  Evolution of Hypervariable Regions, V4 and V7, of Insect 18S rRNA and Their Phylogenetic Implications , 2000, Zoological science.

[50]  K. Kjer,et al.  Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[51]  R. Kristensen,et al.  Relations of the new phylum Cycliophora , 1998, Nature.

[52]  R. Garrett,et al.  Ribosomal Mechanics, Antibiotics, and GTP Hydrolysis , 1999, Cell.

[53]  F. Zimmermann,et al.  18S Ribosomal RNA genes of insects : primary structure of the genes and molecular phylogeny of the Holometabola , 1996 .

[54]  C. Pleij,et al.  Selective Pressures on RNA Hairpins In Vivo and In Vitro , 2002, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[55]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[56]  R. Schuh,et al.  Evolutionary trends in Heteroptera. Part II Mouthpart-structures and feeding strategies , 1979 .