Voluntary technological disclosure as an efficient knowledge management device: An empirical study

This paper investigates three questions related to endogenous information and knowledge disclosure by firms: Which industry sectors are more apt to disclose information and knowledge? Why is such knowledge released? Is knowledge disclosure an efficient strategy? An empirical analysis on four French data sets that focus on appropriation, the practices of innovation, and the related payoffs suggests answers to these questions. A firm with high R&D intensity, from a high-tech sector, participating in R&D partnerships is found to be more likely to engage in disclosure. Firms in the sample were found to ‘leak’ their knowledge to public laboratories to a greater degree than to other private sector firms. Leakage also was found to be associated with improved innovation performance. This research helps broaden the literature on knowledge management practices to include not only the pursuit of formal intellectual property rights such as patents but also less formal inter-organizational knowledge transmission mechanisms.

[1]  Nicholas S. Vonortas.  Inter-firm cooperation with imperfectly appropriable research , 1994 .

[2]  R. Allen,et al.  Collective Invention , 1982 .

[3]  Christian Gourieroux,et al.  Econometrics of Qualitative Dependent Variables , 2000 .

[4]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[5]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[6]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[7]  E. Hippel.  Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[8]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[9]  A. Arora.  Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[10]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[11]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 1993 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[13]  Joanna Poyago-Theotoky,et al.  Equilibrium and Optimal Size of a Research Joint Venture in an Oligopoly with Spillovers , 1995 .

[14]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[15]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[16]  Yannis Katsoulacos,et al.  Endogenous spillovers and the per-formance of research joint ventures , 2003 .

[17]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development , 1986 .

[19]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[20]  Ralph Siebert.  The Impact of Research Joint Ventures on Firm Performance: An Empirical Assessment , 1996 .

[21]  Paul Geroski,et al.  An Applied Econometrician's View of Large Company Performance , 1998 .

[22]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[24]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: an exploration of CIS micro data , 1999 .

[25]  D. Teece.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 2004 .

[26]  Israel Zang,et al.  Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity , 2000 .

[27]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of Patent Pools , 1999 .

[28]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[29]  E. Muller,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels , 1992 .

[30]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data , 2000 .

[31]  Leonard H. Lynn,et al.  Engineering careers, job rotation, and gatekeepers in Japan and the United States , 1993 .

[32]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium , 2002 .

[33]  D. Lichtman,et al.  Strategic Disclosure in the Patent System , 2000 .

[34]  C. d'Aspremont,et al.  Bargaining and Sharing Knowledge , 1996 .

[35]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[36]  Emmanuel Duguet,et al.  Appropriation Strategy and the Motivations to use the Patent System: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing , 2000 .

[37]  Bruno Cassiman,et al.  Endogeneizing Know-How Flows Through the Nature of R&D Investments , 2000 .

[38]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[39]  G. Fraja,et al.  Strategic spillovers in patent races , 1993 .

[40]  D. Ulph,et al.  Organization Design and Information-Sharing in a Research Joint Venture with Spillovers , 1998 .

[41]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[42]  Ronald J. Gilson,et al.  The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete , 1998 .

[43]  A. Kokko,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Spillovers , 1998 .

[44]  R. Keefe,et al.  From the Bottom Up , 2006, Journal of health & social policy.

[45]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[46]  Dominique Foray,et al.  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy Dsti/stp/tip(94)4 Working Group on Innovation and Technology Policy Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Knowledge Base Complete Doc , 2022 .

[47]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers , 1988 .

[48]  R. Merges,et al.  Property Rights, Firm Boundaries, and R&D Inputs , 2001 .

[49]  Hans Gersbach,et al.  Endogenous spillovers and incentives to innovate , 1999 .

[50]  David E. M. Sappington,et al.  Licensing and the sharing of knowledge in research joint ventures , 1992 .

[51]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[52]  Marcel G. Dagenais,et al.  Towards an Innovation Intensity Index: The Case of CIS 1 in Denmark and Ireland , 2002 .

[53]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  High Tech R&D Subsidies: Estimating the Effects of Sematech , 1994 .

[54]  D. Hicks.  Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[55]  K. Pavitt.  What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .

[56]  R. Wieser,et al.  Research and Development Productivity and Spillovers: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level , 2005 .

[57]  E. Hippel.  Horizontal Innovation Networks - By and For Users , 2007 .

[58]  E. Mishan,et al.  The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay , 1971 .

[59]  Masahiko Aoki,et al.  Information and Governance in the Silicon Valley Model , 1999 .

[60]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .