Impact of Granularity on Adjustment Behavior in Adaptive Reuse of Business Process Models

Business process diagrams as exteriorized forms of distributed organizational knowledge can be valuable assets when shared and reused in similar process design tasks. However, little empirical research has been conducted to shed light on the cognitive processes involved during the adaptation of retrieved process models. We hypothesize that model granularity has significant effects on human adjustment behavior irrespective of the editing distances between reuse and solution models. The results of our laboratory experiment, which is dimensioned according to real-world cases, contribute to a more specific classification of adaptation operations and their cognitive efforts, and refine the notion of process similarity. This study follows up on our former research work by amending minor flaws in the experiment setup; it now provides a comprehensive analytical apparatus for further replicated tests as the predictive power of our explorative study, regarding e.g. varied business contexts and task dimensions, remains limited.

[1]  Uday R. Kulkarni,et al.  Strategies for Software Reuse: A Principal Component Analysis of Reuse Practices , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[2]  John Krogstie,et al.  Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[4]  N. S. Prabhu,et al.  Second Language Pedagogy , 1987 .

[5]  Peter Loos,et al.  Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application , 2003, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[6]  Rubén Prieto-Díaz,et al.  Status report: software reusability , 1993, IEEE Software.

[7]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[8]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models , 2008, CAiSE.

[9]  P. Robinson Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework , 2001 .

[10]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[11]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[12]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning , 2003, CACM.

[13]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[14]  Lynne P. Cooper,et al.  Knowledge Reuse for Innovation , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Probabilistic approaches to rough sets , 2003, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[16]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search , 2009, BPM.

[17]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations , 2010, Inf. Syst..

[18]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects , 2008, BPM.

[19]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Performance effects of formal modeling language differences: a combined abstraction level and construct complexity analysis , 2006 .

[20]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  External cognition: how do graphical representations work? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Leah S. Larkey,et al.  Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[22]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[23]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Reuse of knowledge assets from repositories: A mixed methods study , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Chad Saunders,et al.  Cognitive heuristics in software engineering applying and extending anchoring and adjustment to artifact reuse , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[25]  Marta Indulska,et al.  How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..

[26]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques , 2004, Requirements Engineering.

[27]  Forum TeleManagement,et al.  Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM) The Business Process Framework Addendum T : eTOM to M. 3400 Mapping Application Note , 2004 .

[28]  StephensScott Supply Chain Operations Reference Model Version 5.0 , 2001 .

[29]  William B. Frakes,et al.  Software reuse research: status and future , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[30]  Marc Ehrig,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models , 2007, APCCM.

[31]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[32]  S. Plous The psychology of judgment and decision making , 1994 .

[33]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Partition Model of Granular Computing , 2004, Trans. Rough Sets.

[35]  Dinesh Batra,et al.  Comparing a rule-based approach with a pattern-based approach at different levels of complexity of conceptual data modelling tasks , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Olga Levina,et al.  Granularity as a Cognitive Factor in the Effectiveness of Business Process Model Reuse , 2009, BPM.