Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.

The level of improvement in the audiological results of Baha(®) users mainly depends on the patient's preoperative hearing thresholds and the type of Baha sound processor used. This investigation shows correlations between the preoperative hearing threshold and postoperative aided thresholds and audiological results in speech understanding in quiet of 84 Baha users with unilateral conductive hearing loss, bilateral conductive hearing loss and bilateral mixed hearing loss. Secondly, speech understanding in noise of 26 Baha users with different Baha sound processors (Compact, Divino, and BP100) is investigated. Linear regression between aided sound field thresholds and bone conduction (BC) thresholds of the better ear shows highest correlation coefficients and the steepest slope. Differences between better BC thresholds and aided sound field thresholds are smallest for mid-frequencies (1 and 2 kHz) and become larger at 0.5 and 4 kHz. For Baha users, the gain in speech recognition in quiet can be expected to lie in the order of magnitude of the gain in their hearing threshold. Compared to its predecessor sound processors Baha(®) Compact and Baha(®) Divino, Baha(®) BP100 improves speech understanding in noise significantly by +0.9 to +4.6 dB signal-to-noise ratio, depending on the setting and the use of directional microphone. For Baha users with unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss and bilateral mixed hearing loss, audiological results in aided sound field thresholds can be estimated with the better BC hearing threshold. The benefit in speech understanding in quiet can be expected to be similar to the gain in their sound field hearing threshold. The most recent technology of Baha sound processor improves speech understanding in noise by an order of magnitude that is well perceived by users and which can be very useful in everyday life.

[1]  A. Snik,et al.  Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid System Application for Unilateral Congenital Conductive Hearing Impairment: Audiometric Results , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Arjan J. Bosman,et al.  Candidacy for the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  M. Kompis,et al.  Überprüfung der Bezugskurven der Schweizer Version des Freiburger Zahlen- und Einsilbertests , 2005, HNO.

[4]  A Tjellström,et al.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation. , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  R. Jönsson,et al.  BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome. , 2007, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[6]  A Tjellström,et al.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[7]  A Tjellström,et al.  Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[8]  S Stenfelt,et al.  Vibration characteristics of bone conducted sound in vitro. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Noise Reduction Results of an Adaptive Filtering Technique for Dual-Microphone Behind-the-Ear Hearing Aids , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha® Compact and Baha Divino™ , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  P Lurquin,et al.  Intelligibility in noise using multimicrophone hearing aids. , 1996, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[12]  M Valente,et al.  Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  A Tjellström,et al.  Five-year experience with skin-penetrating bone-anchored implants in the temporal bone. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  M Valente,et al.  Performance of dual-microphone in-the-ear hearing aids. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  A. Ernst,et al.  Wertigkeit der BAHA-Testung für das postoperative Hörergebnis , 2008, HNO.

[16]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids: Correlation Between Pure-Tone Thresholds and Outcome in Three User Groups , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[17]  C A Syms,et al.  Hearing Rehabilitation Using the BAHA Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: Results in 40 Patients , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[18]  J. Wazen,et al.  Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[19]  R Häusler,et al.  Bone Conduction Implants: Xomed Audiant Bone Conductor™ vs. BAHA™ , 1997, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[20]  Bob W. Gayler,et al.  Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. , 1990 .