Monitoring respiratory rate with capnography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

s / Resuscitation 85S (2014) S15–S121 S27 tive predictive value of 96.8%/98.6% (training set) and 96.1%/99.5% (test set) respectively, with a mean ventilation-rate error of 0.32±0.58 (training set) and 0.36±0.67 (test set) vent/min. Conclusion: Ventilation patterns were clearly recognizable in most of the capnogram (93.6% of the time). The developed ventilation detector reported a mean error of 0.36±0.67 vent/min with the test set. Monitoring respiratory rate with capnography during CPR is feasible. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.075