A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis based methodology for quantitatively scoring the reliability and relevance of ecotoxicological data.

Ecotoxicological data are highly important for risk assessment processes and are used for deriving environmental quality criteria, which are enacted for assuring the good quality of waters, soils or sediments and achieving desirable environmental quality objectives. Therefore, it is of significant importance the evaluation of the reliability of available data for analysing their possible use in the aforementioned processes. The thorough analysis of currently available frameworks for the assessment of ecotoxicological data has led to the identification of significant flaws but at the same time various opportunities for improvement. In this context, a new methodology, based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques, has been developed with the aim of analysing the reliability and relevance of ecotoxicological data (which are produced through laboratory biotests for individual effects), in a transparent quantitative way, through the use of expert knowledge, multiple criteria and fuzzy logic. The proposed methodology can be used for the production of weighted Species Sensitivity Weighted Distributions (SSWD), as a component of the ecological risk assessment of chemicals in aquatic systems. The MCDA aggregation methodology is described in detail and demonstrated through examples in the article and the hierarchically structured framework that is used for the evaluation and classification of ecotoxicological data is shortly discussed. The methodology is demonstrated for the aquatic compartment but it can be easily tailored to other environmental compartments (soil, air, sediments).

[1]  Michael St J Warne,et al.  Evaluation of Criteria Used to Assess the Quality of Aquatic Toxicity Data , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[2]  C Rudén,et al.  The Swedish Environmental Classification and Information System for Pharmaceuticals--an empirical investigation of the motivations, intentions and expectations underlying its development and implementation. , 2009, Environment international.

[3]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Environmental Risk Assessment , 2009 .

[4]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Probabilistic ecological risk assessment framework for chemical substances. , 2002 .

[5]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[6]  C Rudén,et al.  Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[7]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Ecological risk assessment , 2006 .

[10]  Ord,et al.  Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment , 2014 .

[11]  S. Hansson,et al.  Ten challenges for improved ecotoxicological testing in environmental risk assessment. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[12]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Ryan Thompson,et al.  A New Quality Assurance System for the Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Studies Submitted Under the New Substances Notification Regulations in Canada , 2009, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[14]  L. W. Barnthouse,et al.  User's manual for ecological risk assessment , 1986 .

[15]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[16]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA , 2009 .

[17]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Weight of Evidence Evaluation , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  S. Markich,et al.  A compilation of data on the toxicity of chemicals to species in Australasia: Part 1: Pesticides , 1998 .

[19]  Ow,et al.  Water Quality Standards Handbook , 2014 .

[20]  P. Ciffroy,et al.  Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  D. Weed.  Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Elizabeth Southerland,et al.  Technical Support Document for Water Quality-based Toxics Control , 1991 .