Attention and visual texture segregation.

Visual texture segregation is believed to be performed preattentively. Recent evidence, however, suggests that attention does play an important role. Using visual evoked potentials (VEPs), we investigated the effect of different tasks on texture segregation. Stimuli consisted of Gabor-filtered binary noise patterns. In segregated stimuli, local texture orientation contrasts defined global checkerboard patterns. VEP responses specific to texture segregation were obtained by computing the difference between VEPs to homogeneous and segregated stimuli. Four conditions were examined that required attending either the global pattern, the local structure, random numbers displayed on the screen, or a series of tones. Responses specific to texture segregation were dominated by two occipital negativities peaking around 110 and 230 ms. The earlier one was not affected by the task, whereas the later one was completely abolished when the subjects attended to either numbers or tones (p = .0005 and p = .006, respectively). The results suggest that early stages of texture segregation are not affected by attention, whereas task relevance is crucial for later processes. The timing is compatible with a recurrent processing pattern with initial bottom-up processing of basic stimulus characteristics and a subsequent top-down flow of higher level modulatory information. As attention effects occur across modalities, they cannot be simply explained by competition within the visual cortex.

[1]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Yantis,et al.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[4]  M. Bach,et al.  Texture segregation in traumatic brain injury––a VEP study , 2004, Vision Research.

[5]  R Kawashima,et al.  Positron-emission tomography studies of cross-modality inhibition in selective attentional tasks: closing the "mind's eye". , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  C Meinecke,et al.  Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex , 2006, Brain Research.

[9]  Michael Bach,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  P. Roelfsema Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Effects of Attention on Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potentials: Foveal Field Stimulation Versus Peripheral Field Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[12]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Mechanisms and models of se-lective attention , 1995 .

[13]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  G. Keppel Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[16]  Clara Casco,et al.  A visual evoked potential correlate of global figure-ground segmentation , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event‐related potential study , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  Ladan Shams,et al.  Early modulation of visual cortex by sound: an MEG study , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  M Fahle,et al.  Correlates of figure-ground segregation in fMRI , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Neural substrates for dividing and focusing attention between simultaneous auditory and visual events , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation , 2006, Brain Research.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. , 1983, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Sound alters visual evoked potentials in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[24]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[28]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[29]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey. Evidence from VEP experiments , 1992, Vision Research.

[30]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[31]  A. Achim,et al.  Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo comparison of the sensitivity of different methods. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  M Fahle,et al.  Feature-specific electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation , 2003, Vision Research.

[33]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for an early attentional mechanism in visual processing in humans , 1999, Vision Research.

[34]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Visual attention as a multilevel selection process , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  Bela Julesz,et al.  A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  Skyler Dean,et al.  Mind's Eye , 1973 .

[37]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  The first half second : the microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes , 2006 .

[38]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Masking Interrupts Figure-Ground Signals in V1 , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Michael Bach,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of human texture segregation, an overview , 1998, Documenta Ophthalmologica.