Digital stain separation for histological images

It is often desirable to perform digital image analyses on sections prepared for human interpretation, e.g. nuclear chromatin texture analysis or three‐dimensional reconstructions using sections requiring human delineation of structures of interest. Unfortunately such analyses are often more effective using stains with less complex contrast. Here an automated selective ‘de‐staining’ method for digital images is presented. The method separates an image into its red, green and blue and hue, saturation and intensity components. A mask of stained tissue is prepared by automatic percentile thresholding. A single weighted inverted colour channel is then added to each of the three primary colour channels separately by an iterative algorithm that adjusts the weights to give minimum variance within the mask. The modified red, green and blue channels are then recombined. This method is automatic requiring no pre‐definition of stain colours or special hardware. The method is demonstrated to ‘de‐stain’ nuclei in haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections (and a separate haematoxylin image can be derived from this). An image of isolated brown reaction product is produced with immunoperoxidase preparations counterstained with haematoxylin. Furthermore trichrome (haematoxylin van Gieson, picrosirius red) and other common stains may be separated into their components with modifications of the same algorithm. Although other methods for colour separation do exist (e.g. spectral pathology and colour deconvolution) these require special apparatus or precise calibration and foreknowledge of pure dye colour spectra. The present method of digital stain separation is fully automatic with no such prerequisites.

[1]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Unsupervised Color Decomposition Of Histologically Stained Tissue Samples , 2003, NIPS.

[2]  G Landini,et al.  Digital enhancement of haematoxylin‐ and eosin‐stained histological images for red–green colour‐blind observers , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  Thomas Ried,et al.  Spectral Imaging of Multi-Color Chromogenic Dyes in Pathological Specimens , 2001, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[4]  R. Wootton,et al.  Observer variation in quantification of immunocytochemistry by image analysis , 1991, The Histochemical Journal.

[5]  J W Bacus,et al.  Biological grading of breast cancer using antibodies to proliferating cells and other markers. , 1989, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  R. Jagoe,et al.  Shape and texture analysis of liver cell nuclei in hepatomas by computer aided microscopy. , 1984, Journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  Ruifrok Ac QUANTIFICATION OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING BY COLOR TRANSLATION AND AUTOMATED THRESHOLDING , 1997 .

[8]  Allen M. Gown,et al.  Complete Chromogen Separation and Analysis in Double Immunohistochemical Stains Using Photoshop-based Image Analysis , 1999, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[9]  T. P. Joseph The imaging of benign and malignant breast tissue by flourescence lifetime imaging and optical coherence tomography. , 2003 .

[10]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of immunohistochemical staining by color translation and automated thresholding. , 1997, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[11]  A. Ruifrok,et al.  Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. , 2001, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[12]  John Meyer,et al.  Grading nuclear pleomorphism on histological micrographs , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.