SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF COYOTES ALONG A SUBURBAN-TO-RURAL GRADIENT

Abstract Coyotes (Canis latrans) are now ubiquitous throughout most of the eastern United States; however, little information exists on how they are able to exploit and thrive in fragmented landscapes. We investigated home ranges, movements, and scale-dependent resource selection of coyotes along a gradient (suburban/exurban/rural) of anthropogenic disturbance. Home-range sizes varied along a suburban-to-rural gradient and were inversely correlated to urbanization (R2 = 0.79, P < 0.001). Habitat composition and coyote use of 95% (home range) and 50% (core area) contours were nonrandom. Coyotes used corridor habitat extensively and avoided urban and crop-field habitats. Forested habitat was used extensively for diurnal cover. Rural coyotes traveled greater distances at faster rates than did suburban/exurban coyotes. Diel activity patterns were similar along the gradient, suggesting that coyotes responded similarly to differing levels and types of human activity. Coyotes appeared to assess habitat quality at the landscape scale and exploited small, disjunct resource patches present in developed landscapes. We believe that the availability of foraging habitat and travel corridors is critical to movement of coyotes in areas of high human activity.

[1]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Iberian Lynx in a Fragmented Landscape: Predispersal, Dispersal, and Postdispersal Habitats , 2000 .

[2]  J. T. Major,et al.  Interspecific relationships of coyotes, bobcats, and red foxes in western Maine , 1987 .

[3]  R. Wigglesworth,et al.  The Effect of Suburban and Agricultural Development on the Activity Patterns of Coyotes (Canis latrans) , 2001 .

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[5]  M. Conroy,et al.  Home range, movements, and habitat use of coyotes in southcentral Georgia , 1992 .

[6]  J. Faaborg,et al.  Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone , 1999 .

[7]  J. Laundré,et al.  Home-range size of coyotes: a critical review , 1984 .

[8]  J. A. Litvaitis,et al.  Habitat features associated with predation of New England cottontails: What scale is appropriate? , 1995 .

[9]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[10]  P. Stott,et al.  Home ranges, movements and habitat associations of red foxes Vulpes vulpes in suburban Toronto, Ontario, Canada , 1998 .

[11]  Paul R. Krausman,et al.  Home Range, Habitat Use, and Nocturnal Activity of Coyotes in an Urban Environment , 2001 .

[12]  Eric M. Gese,et al.  Home Range and Habitat Use of Coyotes in Southeastern Colorado , 1988 .

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[14]  G. J. Smith,et al.  Sampling strategies for radio-tracking coyotes , 1981 .

[15]  F. Messier,et al.  The social system of the coyote (Canis latrans) in a forested habitat , 1982 .

[16]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[17]  W. F. Andelt,et al.  Home Range, Activity, and Daily Movements of Coyotes , 1979 .

[18]  O. J. Rongstad,et al.  Changes in Coyote Movements Due to Military Activity , 1989 .

[19]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator–prey interactions , 1987, Nature.

[20]  O. J. Rongstad,et al.  Relationship between Coyote Group Size and Diet in Southeastern Colorado , 1988 .

[21]  M. Soulé,et al.  Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system , 1999, Nature.

[22]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  F. Knowlton,et al.  Coyote space use in relation to prey abundance , 1991 .

[24]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Feeding Ecology of Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the City of Oxford, England , 1990 .

[25]  R. Swihart,et al.  Body size, niche breadth, and ecologically scaled responses to habitat fragmentation: mammalian predators in an agricultural landscape , 2003 .

[26]  B. L. Keller,et al.  Home-range use by coyotes in Idaho , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  John A. Litvaitis,et al.  The role of spatial scale in understanding responses of medium-sized carnivores to forest fragmentation , 1996 .

[28]  R. Ruff,et al.  Social and nutritional factors influencing the dispersal of resident coyotes , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  D. Mason,et al.  Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator-prey metapopulation model. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Norman A. Slade,et al.  Testing For Independence of Observations in Animal Movements , 1985 .

[31]  Gary C. White,et al.  Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data , 1990 .

[32]  Paul C. Paquet,et al.  Conservation Biology and Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains , 1996 .

[33]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[34]  S. Harris.  The food of suburban foxes (Vulpes vulpes), with special reference to London , 1981 .

[35]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Measurement of territory and home range size in birds , 1955 .