Launching at a distance: The effect of spatial markers

It has been widely reported that spatial contiguity is important to judgements of causality involving one object launching another [Michotte's “launching effect” (1963, 1991)]. The present study examined the impact of different types of spatial markers on causal judgements of a distal launch (one object approaching other, stopping short of it, and the second object subsequently moving along the same trajectory). The spatial markers were objects that either partially or completely bridged the spatial gap between two objects (Experiment 1), or they were dashed lines that marked the stopping location of the first object or the starting location of the second object (Experiment 2). The presence of either objects or dashed lines could produce higher causal ratings, but the location of the marker mattered. The results suggest that altering a cause's ability to predict when the effect would occur (via a spatial marker) and the presence of a conduit for energy transmission have independent effects on causal judgements of object interaction.

[1]  P. Juslin,et al.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.

[2]  D. Gilden.  On the origins of dynamical awareness. , 1991, Psychological review.

[3]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Jon May,et al.  Rethinking Temporal Contiguity and the Judgement of Causality: Effects of Prior Knowledge, Experience, and Reinforcement Procedure , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  Timothy L. Hubbard,et al.  Naïve impetus and Michotte's "tool effect": evidence from representational momentum , 2003, Psychological research.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .

[7]  Michael R. Waldmann,et al.  How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[8]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Do 9-Month-Olds Perceive Causation-at-a-Distance? , 1999, Perception.

[9]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  A Computational Theory of Learning Causal Relationships , 1991, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Effects of contiguity, regularity, and age on children's causal inferences. , 1974 .

[11]  Eugene Subbotsky.  Magical thinking in judgments of causation: Can anomalous phenomena affect ontological causal beliefs in children and adults? , 2004 .

[12]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[13]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Observers’ sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  M. Young,et al.  Color change as a causal agent revisited. , 2008, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  H. Gruber,et al.  Effects of experience on perception of causality. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M. Yela.  Phenomenal Causation at a Distance , 1952 .

[17]  R. Siegler.  Defining the Locus of Developmental Differences in Children's Causal Reasoning. , 1975 .

[18]  Uwe Oestermeier,et al.  Verbal and visual causal arguments , 2000, Cognition.

[19]  F. Keil.  Folkscience: coarse interpretations of a complex reality , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  M. Buehner,et al.  Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction , 2002 .

[21]  R. Oppermann.  The perception of light: by W. D. Wright. 100 pages, illustrations, 13 × 19 cms. London, Blackie & Son Limited. Price 6 s , 1939 .

[22]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[23]  Michael D. Berzonsky,et al.  The role of familiarity in children's explanations of physical causality. , 1971 .

[24]  T. Shultz,et al.  The Use of Covariation as a Principle of Causal Analysis. , 1975 .

[25]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: spontaneous reports and ratings. , 2006, Acta psychologica.