Cell Type–Specific Importance of Ras–c-Raf Complex Association Rate Constants for MAPK Signaling

Ras–c-Raf association rates affect downstream signaling in the absence of negative feedback but not its presence. Network Topology Dictates Robustness to Dynamical Changes Stimulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) leads to activation of a large complex signaling network that regulates numerous cellular functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Activation of the kinase c-Raf by the small GTPase Ras is central to the subsequent activation of the extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) branch of the EGFR signaling network. Here, Kiel and Serrano, who previously found that the rate of association between Ras and c-Raf is evolutionarily conserved, investigated the effects of various c-Raf mutations that affected the rate of Ras–c-Raf association, dissociation, or both. They found that association rates seemed to have more effect on ERK signaling than dissociation rates. Intriguingly, however, the effects depended on the specific details of the ERK pathway. In a cell line in which EGF elicits sustained ERK phosphorylation and signaling, c-Raf mutants with similar affinity for Ras, but lower association rates, were less effective at stimulating downstream ERK signaling than wild-type c-Raf, whereas the reverse was true for mutants with higher association rates. In contrast, these effects were not apparent in cell lines in which negative feedback from ERK led to its transient phosphorylation and downstream signaling. We generated 17 c-Raf (RAF proto-oncogene serine-threonine protein kinase) mutants with altered Ras-Raf association and dissociation rates to investigate the role of electrostatically driven Ras-Raf association rates on epidermal growth factor (EGF)–activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction. Some of these mutants had compensating changes in association and dissociation rates, enabling the effects of changes in association rate to be distinguished from those of changes in affinity. In rabbit kidney (RK13) cells, these mutants affected downstream signaling, with changes in Ras–c-Raf association rates having a greater effect on MAPK signaling than did similar changes in dissociation rates. Mutants with compensating decreases in both association and dissociation rates stimulated less extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)–dependent reporter activity than did wild-type c-Raf, whereas the converse was true for mutants with increased association and dissociation rates. In marked contrast, the mutants had little or no effect on signaling in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. These two cell lines also showed distinct patterns of EGF-dependent ERK phosphorylation and signaling: ERK activation and signaling were transient in HEK293 cells and sustained in RK13 cells, with the difference resulting from the lack of negative feedback from ERK to Sos (Son of Sevenless) in the latter. Computer simulation revealed that, in the presence of negative feedback, changes in the rate of Ras–c-Raf binding have little effect on ERK activation. Thus, EGF-MAPK activation kinetics and feedback regulation is cell type specific and depends on the network topology.

[1]  Mike Tyers,et al.  A Mechanism for Cell-Cycle Regulation of MAP Kinase Signaling in a Yeast Differentiation Pathway , 2007, Cell.

[2]  Jodi Gureasko,et al.  Membrane-dependent signal integration by the Ras activator Son of sevenless , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  D. Bar-Sagi,et al.  Identification of the mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites on human Sos1 that regulate interaction with Grb2 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[4]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 1993 .

[5]  Mark S. Boguski,et al.  Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives , 1993, Nature.

[6]  A. Yoshimura,et al.  Model analysis of difference between EGF pathway and FGF pathway. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  L. Serrano,et al.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  François Stricher,et al.  The FoldX web server: an online force field , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[10]  M. Karin,et al.  Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades , 2001, Nature.

[11]  W. Kolch Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  Thomas Edouard,et al.  Signal Strength Dictates Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Contribution to Ras/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Activation via Differential Gab1/Shp2 Recruitment: Consequences for Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[13]  F. McCormick,et al.  A cytoplasmic protein stimulates normal N-ras p21 GTPase, but does not affect oncogenic mutants. , 1987, Science.

[14]  Maria Victoria Schneider,et al.  MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database. , 2002, FEBS letters.

[15]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 2000, Cell.

[16]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Insulin receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor dephosphorylation by three major rat liver protein-tyrosine phosphatases expressed in a recombinant bacterial system. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[17]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Input–output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Ralf Janknecht,et al.  Ras/Rap effector specificity determined by charge reversal , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  R. Janknecht Analysis of the ERK-stimulated ETS transcription factor ER81 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  D. Dumont,et al.  Recruitment of Dok-R to the EGF receptor through its PTB domain is required for attenuation of Erk MAP kinase activation , 1999, Current Biology.

[21]  A. Wittinghofer,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity analysis correlating Ras/Raf interaction in vitro to Raf activation in vivo , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Common effector processing mediates cell-specific responses to stimuli , 2007, Nature.

[24]  M Ander,et al.  SmartCell, a framework to simulate cellular processes that combines stochastic approximation with diffusion and localisation: analysis of simple networks. , 2004, Systems biology.

[25]  J. Schlessinger Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 2000, Cell.

[26]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  New insights into the mechanism of protein–protein association , 2001, Proteins.

[28]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Identification of the sites in MAP kinase kinase‐1 phosphorylated by p74raf‐1. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[29]  Igor Goryanin,et al.  The impact of the regulatory design on the response of epidermal growth factor receptor‐mediated signal transduction towards oncogenic mutations , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[30]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Crystal structure and functional analysis of Ras binding to its effector phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma. , 2000, Cell.

[31]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Association Rate Constants of Ras-Effector Interactions Are Evolutionarily Conserved , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  H. Kitano A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[33]  John Kuriyan,et al.  The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  Boris N Kholodenko,et al.  Scaffolding Protein Grb2-associated Binder 1 Sustains Epidermal Growth Factor-induced Mitogenic and Survival Signaling by Multiple Positive Feedback Loops* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of Short Term Signaling by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  R M Zinkernagel,et al.  Early high-affinity neutralizing anti-viral IgG responses without further overall improvements of affinity. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Erez M. Bublil,et al.  The EGF receptor family : spearheading a merger of signaling and therapeutics , 2007 .

[39]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[40]  Gabriele Ausiello,et al.  MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  Y. Kido,et al.  Grb2/Ash binds directly to tyrosines 1068 and 1086 and indirectly to tyrosine 1148 of activated human epidermal growth factor receptors in intact cells. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Tuning Bulk Electrostatics to Regulate Protein Function , 2007, Cell.

[43]  G Schreiber,et al.  Electrostatically optimized Ras-binding Ral guanine dissociation stimulator mutants increase the rate of association by stabilizing the encounter complex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  R. Roepman,et al.  A novel tandem affinity purification strategy for the efficient isolation and characterisation of native protein complexes , 2007, Proteomics.

[45]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Hierarchy of binding sites for Grb2 and Shc on the epidermal growth factor receptor , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[46]  D. Mcnamara,et al.  Determinants of Substrate Recognition in the Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase, PTP1 (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  I R Vetter,et al.  Structural and biochemical analysis of Ras‐effector signaling via RalGDS , 1999, FEBS letters.