The challenges faced by living stock collections in the USA

Many discoveries in the life sciences have been made using material from living stock collections. These collections provide a uniform and stable supply of living organisms and related materials that enhance the reproducibility of research and minimize the need for repetitive calibration. While collections differ in many ways, they all require expertise in maintaining living organisms and good logistical systems for keeping track of stocks and fulfilling requests for specimens. Here, we review some of the contributions made by living stock collections to research across all branches of the tree of life, and outline the challenges they face. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24611.001

[1]  McCluskeyKevin.  A Review of Living Collections with Special Emphasis on Sustainability and Its Impact on Research Across Multiple Disciplines , 2017 .

[2]  K. McCluskey.  A Review of Living Collections with Special Emphasis on Sustainability and Its Impact on Research Across Multiple Disciplines , 2017, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[3]  Jianhui Li,et al.  World data centre for microorganisms: an information infrastructure to explore and utilize preserved microbial strains worldwide , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  S. Casaregola,et al.  Yeast culture collections in the twenty‐first century: new opportunities and challenges , 2016, Yeast.

[5]  A. Plant,et al.  Standards for Cell Line Authentication and Beyond , 2016, PLoS biology.

[6]  Nitin Kumar,et al.  Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation , 2016, Nature.

[7]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  A Proposal Regarding Best Practices for Validating the Identity of Genetic Stocks and the Effects of Genetic Variants[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Cell.

[8]  J. Eisen,et al.  The United States Culture Collection Network (USCCN): Enhancing Microbial Genomics Research through Living Microbe Culture Collections , 2015, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  Joanne Kamens,et al.  The Addgene repository: an international nonprofit plasmid and data resource , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  J. Kamens.  Addgene: Making Materials Sharing “Science As Usual” , 2014, PLoS biology.

[11]  D. R. Robertson,et al.  Specimen collection: an essential tool. , 2014, Science.

[12]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  StrainInfo introduces electronic passports for microorganisms. , 2014, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[13]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Agriculture: Feeding the future , 2013, Nature.

[14]  Facilitating reproducibility. , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[15]  Monya Baker,et al.  Biorepositories: Building better biobanks , 2012, Nature.

[16]  E. Welch,et al.  Governing Global Scientific Research Commons under the Nagoya Protocol , 2012 .

[17]  M. Plamann,et al.  Best practices for fungal germplasm repositories and perspectives on their implementation , 2012, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  D. Geiser,et al.  Widespread Occurrence of Diverse Human Pathogenic Types of the Fungus Fusarium Detected in Plumbing Drains , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[19]  Paul F. Uhlir,et al.  Designing the Microbial Research Commons , 2011 .

[20]  Joy Bergelson,et al.  Source verification of mis-identified Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. , 2011, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[21]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006, American Economic Review.

[22]  C. Kurtzman.  The Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection: Germplasm Accessions and Research Programs , 2011 .

[23]  P. Uhlir.  Designing the Microbial Research Commons: Proceedings of an International Symposium , 2010 .

[24]  Renzo Kottmann,et al.  Microbiological Common Language (MCL): a standard for electronic information exchange in the Microbial Commons. , 2010, Research in microbiology.

[25]  T. Dedeurwaerdere.  Global microbial commons: institutional challenges for the global exchange and distribution of microorganisms in the life sciences. , 2010, Research in microbiology.

[26]  H. Parkes,et al.  The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? , 2007, BioTechniques.

[27]  M. Ryan,et al.  Culture collections in the twenty-first century. , 2001, Biologist.

[28]  G. Stacey,et al.  Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now , 2000, Nature.

[29]  K. Makino,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product , 1987, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  J R Johnston,et al.  Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. , 1986, Genetics.

[31]  K. Mullis,et al.  Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. , 1986, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[32]  M. Amemura,et al.  Escherichia coli mutants deficient in the production of alkaline phosphatase isozymes , 1978, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  K. Raper,et al.  Penicillin: II. Natural Variation and Penicillin Production in Penicillium notatum and Allied Species. , 1944, Journal of bacteriology.