Temporal-Layer-Motivated Lambda Domain Picture Level Rate Control for Random-Access Configuration in H.265/HEVC

Rate control is a key technique for video communication systems. The aim of rate control is to transmit the best possible quality video sequences under various restrictions, such as channel bandwidth, buffer capacity, maximum time delay allowed for a given service, and so on. The <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula> domain rate control technique (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-RC) has been integrated into the latest High Efficiency Video Coding standard (H.265/HEVC) test model, due to its accurate bit estimation and high rate-distortion performance. However, it is found that the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-RC is not the optimal choice under the random-access configuration. When the random-access configuration is used, pictures are organized into temporal layers, where pictures in different layers are of different importance in terms of prediction. In this paper, a picture level lambda domain rate control technique for the random-access configuration in H.265/HEVC is proposed. The influence of temporal layers is effectively considered in the proposed algorithm referred to as TL-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-PRC. Experimental results verify that the proposed TL-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-PRC is efficient in coding performance and accurate in bit estimation. Compared with the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-RC with the fixed ration bit allocation which has been implemented in the test model of H.265/HEVC (HM 14.0), TL-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lambda $ </tex-math></inline-formula>-PRC achieves an average reduction of 4.10% and 3.49% for slow motion and fast motion sequences, respectively, in BD-rate (Bjøntegaard-Delta bitrate) with more accurate bit estimation. The performance of different algorithms in terms of algorithm complexity and quality fluctuation are also carefully analyzed in this contribution.

[1]  Limin Wang Rate control for MPEG video coding , 2000, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[2]  Xuan Jing,et al.  Frame Complexity-Based Rate-Quantization Model for H.264/AVC Intraframe Rate Control , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[3]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Low-delay rate control for DCT video coding via ?-domain source modeling , 2001, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[4]  Heiko Schwarz,et al.  Overview of the Scalable Video Coding Extension of the H.264/AVC Standard , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[5]  Shengxi Li,et al.  Weight-based R-λ rate control for perceptual HEVC coding on conversational videos , 2015, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[6]  Tihao Chiang,et al.  Scalable rate control for MPEG-4 video , 2000, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[7]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  A Frame-Level Rate Control Scheme Based on Texture and Nontexture Rate Models for High Efficiency Video Coding , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[8]  Bo Li,et al.  A Visual-Masking-Based Estimation Algorithm for Temporal Pumping Artifact Region Prediction , 2017, Circuits Syst. Signal Process..

[9]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[10]  Yuan Yang,et al.  Rate-Distortion-Optimization-Based Quantization Parameter Cascading Technique for Random-Access Configuration in H.265/HEVC , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[11]  David R. Bull,et al.  An adaptive resolution rate control method for intra coding in HEVC , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[12]  Wen Gao,et al.  Rate-GOP Based Rate Control for High Efficiency Video Coding , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[13]  King Ngi Ngan,et al.  Low-Delay Rate Control for Consistent Quality Using Distortion-Based Lagrange Multiplier , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Houqiang Li,et al.  $\lambda $ Domain Rate Control Algorithm for High Efficiency Video Coding , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Adi Ben-Israel A Newton-Raphson method for the solution of systems of equations , 1966 .

[16]  André Kaup,et al.  Adaptive quantization parameter cascading for hierarchical video coding , 2010, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[17]  Xiaoyan Sun,et al.  Optimal Bit Allocation for CTU Level Rate Control in HEVC , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[18]  Aidong Men,et al.  An SSIM-motivated LCU-level rate control algorithm for HEVC , 2013, 2013 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS).

[19]  Bin Li,et al.  $\lambda $ -Domain Optimal Bit Allocation Algorithm for High Efficiency Video Coding , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.