Validation of exposure information in occupational epidemiology.

Exposure data may be inadequate mainly for two reasons; they may not comply with a reasonable exposure-effect model or they may be biased. In the use of historical data it is essential to keep track of what the data were supposed to mean when collected in the first place. Most measurements of air contaminants in work places are probably carried out to establish compliance or non-compliance with limit values. Sometimes measurements are also made to evaluate control measures. Unfortunately, measurement data acquired in this way may have very little to do with the true average exposure of employees. The influence of trends and variations in production on the exposure level is substantial. This influence is similar and coincidental in widely different industries. In addition the variations attributed to production levels, there can be important variations due to season.

[1]  John Ferguson,et al.  The Use of Chemical Potentials as Indices of Toxicity , 1939 .

[2]  S A Roach,et al.  A more rational basis for air sampling programs. , 1966, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  S A Roach,et al.  A most rational basis for air sampling programmes. , 1977, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  N Esmen,et al.  Retrospective industrial hygiene surveys. , 1979, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  Y. Alarie,et al.  Sensory irritation, pulmonary irritation, and respiratory stimulation by airborne benzene and alkylbenzenes: prediction of safe industrial exposure levels and correlation with their thermodynamic properties. , 1982, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[6]  U Ulfvarson,et al.  Limitations to the use of employee exposure data on air contaminants in epidemiologic studies , 1983, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[7]  S. Rappaport.  Smoothing of exposure variability at the receptor: implications for health standards. , 1985, Annals of Occupational Hygiene.

[8]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. , 1987, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  U. Ulfvarson.  Assessment of concentration peaks in setting exposure limits for air contaminants at workplaces, with special emphasis on narcotic and irritative gases and vapors. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  C. Hogstedt,et al.  Effects of exposure to vehicle exhaust on health. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[11]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  Evaluating Occupation and Industry Separately to Assess Exposures in Case-Control Studies , 1989 .

[12]  John S. Evans,et al.  Subjective Estimation of Toluene Exposures: A Calibration Study of Industrial Hygienists , 1989 .

[13]  C. Hertzman,et al.  A comparison of exposure estimates by worker raters and industrial hygienists. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[14]  L. Barregard,et al.  Mercury in the Swedish chloralkali industry--an evaluation of the exposure and preventive measures over 40 years. , 1990, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  G. Hedenstierna,et al.  Decreased lung function and exposure to diisocyanates (HDI and HDI-BT) in car repair painters: observations on re-examination 6 years after initial study. , 1990, American journal of industrial medicine.

[16]  U Ulfvarson,et al.  Reduction in adverse effect on pulmonary function after exposure to filtered diesel exhaust. , 1990, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  B Laursen,et al.  Bias and random errors in historical data of exposure to organic solvents. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[18]  U. Ulfvarson,et al.  Pulmonary function in workers exposed to diesel exhausts: the effect of control measures. , 1991, American journal of industrial medicine.