Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm

Headwater catchments are sources of sediments, nutrients, and biota for larger streams, yet the hydrologic pathways that transport these materials remain unclear. Dynamics of stormflow generation related to landform attributes and antecedent rainfall were investigated in a steep forested headwater catchment at Hitachi Ohta Experimental Watershed, Japan. Such headwater catchments are deeply incised: the narrow riparian corridors have limited capacities to store and transmit water to streams. Storm runoff was monitored at several nested scales within the catchment: (1) 2·48 ha first-order drainage (FB); (2) incipient 0·84 ha first-order drainage (FA) comprized of two zero-order basins; (3) 0·25 ha zero-order basin (ZB); and (4) 45 m2 hillslope segment (HS), including subsurface matrix flow (MF) and preferential flow (PF). Results from applied tracer and staining tests as well as observations of piezometric, tensiometric, and subsurface temperature responses were also employed to elucidate hydrologic pathways during storms. During the driest conditions, water yield from FB was only 1%; runoff occurred as saturated overland flow from the small riparian zone and direct channel interception. For slightly wetter conditions, subsurface flow from the soil matrix augmented stormflow. As wetness increased, two significant non-linear hydrologic responses occurred: (1) threshold response in geomorphic hollows (zero-order basins) where runoff initiated after an accumulation of shallow groundwater; and (2) self-organization and expansion of preferential flow pathways, which facilitate subsurface drainage. Stormflow increases observed during periods of increasing antecedent wetness depend upon temporal and spatial linkages and the unique hydrologic behavior of three components: (1) narrow riparian corridors; (2) linear hillslopes; and (3) geomorphic hollows. These linkages form the basis for an emerging hydrogeomorphic concept of stormflow generation for steep forested headwaters. Knowledge of stormflow response is critical to the assessment of management practices in these headwater areas as well as the routing of water and materials to larger stream systems. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  THROUGHFLOW, OVERLAND FLOW AND EROSION , 1967 .

[2]  J. S. Pollard,et al.  Determination of contributing areas for saturation overland flow from chemical hydrograph separations , 1993 .

[3]  Andrew J. Pearce,et al.  Storm Runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response , 1986 .

[4]  B. Knapp.  A system for the field measurement of soil water movement , 1973 .

[5]  Towards Pore-Scale Analysis of Preferential Flow and Chemical Transport , 1993 .

[6]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Flow and solute transport through the soil matrix and macropores of a hillslope segment , 1994 .

[7]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Differences in oxygen-18 content of throughfall and rainfall in hardwood and coniferous forests , 1994 .

[8]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment , 1998 .

[9]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Seasonal hydrologic response at various spatial scales in a small forested catchment, Hitachi Ohta, Japan , 1995 .

[10]  Hydrology of a forested hillslope during storm events , 1990 .

[11]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment , 1988 .

[12]  R. Gillham.  The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table response , 1984 .

[13]  Ross Woods,et al.  The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside , 1996 .

[14]  R. Z. Whipkey.  SUBSURFACE STORMFLOW FROM FORESTED SLOPES , 1965 .

[15]  H. L. Ragsdale,et al.  Acidic atmospheric deposition and canopy interactions of adjacent deciduous and coniferous forests in the Georgia Piedmont , 1993 .

[16]  M. Fujieda,et al.  Hydrological processes at two subtropical forest catchments: the Serra do Mar, São Paulo, Brazil , 1997 .

[17]  Anthony Jones,et al.  Soil Piping and Stream Channel Initiation , 1971 .

[18]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall , 1997 .

[19]  R. Moore.  Tracing runoff sources with deuterium and oxygen-88 during spring melt in a headwater catchment, southern Laurentians, Quebec , 1989 .

[20]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Subsurface flow responses of a small forested catchment in the Ouachita mountains , 1992 .

[21]  R. Sidle,et al.  A Comparison of Piezometric Response in Unchanneled Hillslope Hollows: Coastal Alaska and Japan , 1992 .

[22]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  Hydrological Effects of Land-Use Change in a Zero-Order Catchment , 1998 .

[23]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  The role of topography in controlling throughflow generation , 1978 .

[24]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Effect of Catchment‐Scale Subsurface Mixing on Stream Isotopic Response , 1991 .

[25]  M. Tani.  Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observations on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer , 1997 .

[26]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[27]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[28]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Morphological Characteristics of Macropores and the Distribution of Preferential Flow Pathways in a Forested Slope Segment , 1999 .

[29]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards the use of catchment geomorphology in flood frequency predictions , 1987 .

[30]  D. A. Lietzke,et al.  Hydrogeochemical processes controlling subsurface transport from an upper subcatchment of Walker Branch watershed during storm events. 1. Hydrologic transport processes , 1991 .

[31]  Tadashi Tanaka,et al.  The Hachioji Experimental Basin Study — Storm runoff processes and the mechanism of its generation , 1988 .

[32]  R. J. Bartlett,et al.  Flow path studies in forested watersheds of headwater tributaries of Brush Brook, Vermont , 1994 .

[33]  J. Hewlett.  Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[34]  Yoshinori Tsukamoto,et al.  Runoff process on a steep forested slope , 1988 .

[35]  A zero-order basin: its contribution to catchment hydrology and internal hydrological processes , 2000 .

[36]  R. Sidle,et al.  Cumulative effects: A broader approach to water quality research , 1991 .

[37]  K. Feger,et al.  Element budgets of two contrasting catchments in the Black Forest (Federal Republic of Germany) , 1990 .

[38]  Keith Beven,et al.  NEW METHOD DEVELOPED FOR STUDYING FLOW ON HILLSLOPES , 1996 .

[39]  M. Mosley.  Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[40]  M. Sklash,et al.  The Role Of Groundwater In Storm Runoff , 1979 .

[41]  J. Buttle,et al.  INFERRING HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN A TEMPERATE BASIN USING ISOTOPIC AND GEOCHEMICAL HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION: A RE-EVALUATION , 1997 .

[42]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[43]  H. Elsenbeer,et al.  Chemical fingerprints of hydrological compartments and flow paths at La Cuenca, Western Amazonia , 1995 .

[44]  R. Wagenet,et al.  Simulation of water and chemicals in macropore soils Part 1. Representation of the equivalent macropore influence and its effect on soilwater flow , 1992 .