Digital twins to enhance the integration of ergonomics in the workplace design

Abstract Recently, human-centered design has become one of the most promising approaches for improving the entire production process design. During the design phase, among the main important aspects to investigate, ergonomic performance of the workplace (WP) plays a key role. It is well known that design errors can lead to significant delays in the design and engineering of a production process, especially when it is related to a complex system such as the assembly line of an automotive industry. Prediction of the ergonomic performance, which is often coarsely considered during the design phase, can represent a fundamental step in preventing ergonomic issues since the early design phase of a production process, avoiding also negative consequences on line balancing. Based on a concurrent engineering (CE) approach, the aim of this paper is to present a framework that uses digital twins of stations in order to minimise the time necessary to develop and design a new assembly line. The application of this procedure will allow avoiding the possibility of realising a line that reveals ergonomic problems and correcting design errors during the design phase and not just during the production phase. In this way, it is possible to achieve great advantages in terms of cost avoidance for the correction of the design errors and in terms of time to market, which will be significantly reduced. A digital twin of a real station of a Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) assembly line is presented to validate the numerical procedure and the design approach proposed in this paper. Finally, numerical results, regarding the evaluation of an ergonomic index, were compared with experimental ones achieved by analysing data collected during an experimental session.

[1]  Sigvard Rubenowitz,et al.  Survey and intervention of ergonomic problems at the workplace , 1997 .

[2]  Bilal Ahmad,et al.  Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems ( CATS ) A lightweight approach for human factor assessment in virtual assembly designs : an evaluation model for postural risk and metabolic workload , 2016 .

[3]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics - A case study of parallel and serial flow strategies , 2006 .

[4]  Mauro Gamberi,et al.  Multi-objective assembly line balancing considering component picking and ergonomic risk , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  A model for calculation of the costs of poor assembly ergonomics (part 1) , 2014 .

[6]  Leon Straker,et al.  A case study of the use of ergonomics information in a heavy engineering design process , 2000 .

[7]  E. J. Carey,et al.  Evaluation of human postures with computer aids and virtual workplace designs , 2002 .

[8]  Andrey Kutin,et al.  Simulation Modeling of Assembly Processes in Digital Manufacturing , 2018 .

[9]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Approach to Reducing Design Delivery Time , 2005 .

[10]  Lorenzo Tiacci,et al.  Integrating ergonomic risks evaluation through OCRA index and balancing/sequencing decisions for mixed model stochastic asynchronous assembly lines , 2017, Omega.

[11]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  Future directions for the development of virtual reality within an automotive manufacturer. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Keith Popplewell,et al.  A review of the support tools for the process of assembly method selection and assembly planning , 2003 .

[13]  Jan Dul,et al.  Ergonomics Contributions to Company Strategies , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Michal Hovanec TECNOMATIX FOR SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION IN THE AREA OF SIMULATION MANUFACTURING AND ERGONOMICS , 2011 .

[15]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[16]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[17]  Harold Bright Maynard,et al.  Methods-time measurement , 1948 .

[18]  Olivier Roulet-Dubonnet,et al.  Case study: Application of Design for Automated Assembly methods in the development of an electronic product from early design to design freeze , 2018 .

[19]  Francesco Caputo,et al.  Human Posture Tracking System for Industrial Process Design and Assessment , 2018, IHSI.

[20]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  Cloud-based design and manufacturing: A new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[21]  Giorgio Mossa,et al.  Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model , 2016 .

[22]  G Caragnano,et al.  ERGO-MTM model: an integrated approach to set working times based upon standardized working performance and controlled biomechanical load. , 2012, Work.

[23]  Sungzoon Cho,et al.  Knowledge extraction and visualization of digital design process , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..