Neural correlates of size illusions: an event-related potential study

The aim of this study was to investigate the neural correlates of size illusions. Participants were presented with a sphere of a fixed angular size positioned (i) at either a far or close position within a three-dimensional virtual scene or (ii) at either an upper or lower screen position on a plain gray background. The visual-evoked potentials were recorded while participants were required to fixate on and attend to the sphere. The results showed that the amplitude of visual P2 component was affected by sphere position in the three-dimensional scene condition only, suggesting that the activity level of the primary visual cortex was modulated by the size illusion at later stages of visual processing.

[1]  Laurent Petit,et al.  Early visual evoked potentials are modulated by eye position in humans induced by whole body rotations , 2004, BMC Neuroscience.

[2]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Assessment of stimulus-induced changes in human V1 visual field maps. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. B. Joynson.  The Problem of Size and Distance , 1949 .

[4]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Edelman,et al.  Reentry and the problem of integrating multiple cortical areas: simulation of dynamic integration in the visual system. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  G. Mangun,et al.  Covariations in ERP and PET measures of spatial selective attention in human extrastriate visual cortex , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[7]  D. McCready.  On size, distance, and visual angle perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[9]  H. Gruber,et al.  Moon Illusion and Emmert's Law , 1962, Science.

[10]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  Eye position signals modulate early dorsal and ventral visual areas. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  T Allison,et al.  Contextual guidance of attention: human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feedback modulation in anatomically early temporally late stages of visual processing. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  R. Freeman,et al.  Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[15]  Tomoka Naganuma,et al.  Neural Correlates for Perception of 3D Surface Orientation from Texture Gradient , 2002, Science.

[16]  Common neural processing regions for dynamic and static stereopsis in human parieto-occipital cortices , 2002 .

[17]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  Eye position effects in macaque area V4 , 2000, Neuroreport.

[18]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Perceived Size and Spatial Coding , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  Pattern reversal visual evoked responses of V1/V2 and V5/MT as revealed by MEG combined with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  J M Foley,et al.  The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. , 1972, Vision research.