Complementarity of δ opioid ligand pharmacophore and receptor models

The elaboration of a pharmacophore model for the delta opioid receptor selective ligand JOM-13 (Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH) and the parallel, independent development of a structural model of the delta receptor are summarized. Although the backbone conformation of JOM-13's tripeptide cycle is well defined, considerable conformational lability is evident in the Tyr(1) residue and in the Phe(3) side chain, key pharmacophore elements of the ligand. Replacement of these flexible features of the ligand by more conformationally restricted analogues and subsequent correlation of receptor binding and conformational properties allowed the number of possible binding conformations of JOM-13 to be reduced to two. Of these, one was chosen as more likely, based on its better superposition with other conformationally constrained delta receptor ligands. Our model of the delta opioid receptor, constructed using a general approach that we have developed for all rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors, contains a large cavity within the transmembrane domain that displays excellent complementarity in both shape and polarity to JOM-13 and other delta ligands. This binding pocket, however, cannot accommodate the conformer of JOM-13 preferred from analysis of ligands, alone. Rather, only the "alternate" allowed conformer, identified from analysis of the ligands but "disfavored" because it does not permit simultaneous superposition of all pharmacophore elements of JOM-13 with other delta ligands, fits the binding site. These results argue against a simple view of a single, common fit to a receptor binding site and suggest, instead, that at least some binding site interactions of different ligands may differ.

[1]  John P. Overington,et al.  Modeling α‐helical transmembrane domains: The calculation and use of substitution tables for lipid‐facing residues , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  A. Lomize,et al.  Development of a model for the delta-opioid receptor pharmacophore. 4. Residue 3 dehydrophenylalanine analogues of Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13) confirm required gauche orientation of aromatic side chain. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[3]  A. Lomize,et al.  Opioid receptor three-dimensional structures from distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[4]  J. Wess,et al.  Site-directed Mutagenesis Identifies Residues Involved in Ligand Recognition in the Human A2a Adenosine Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  A. Lomize,et al.  The transmembrane 7-alpha-bundle of rhodopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[6]  T F Burks,et al.  Bis-penicillamine enkephalins possess highly improved specificity toward delta opioid receptors. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  F E Cohen,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved Galphabetagamma binding surfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Y. Fukada,et al.  What makes red visual pigments red? A resonance Raman microprobe study of retinal chromophore structure in iodopsin. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[9]  K Osterlund,et al.  Unexpected binding mode of a cyclic sulfamide HIV-1 protease inhibitor. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  K. Nagai,et al.  Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. , 1988, Protein engineering.

[11]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease: a major success of structure-assisted drug design. , 1998, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[12]  A. Lomize,et al.  Development of a model for the delta-opioid receptor pharmacophore: 3. Comparison of the cyclic tetrapeptide, Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH with other conformationally constrained delta-receptor selective ligands. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[13]  S. Watson,et al.  The G-Protein Linked Receptor Facts Book , 1994 .

[14]  H. Mosberg,et al.  Cyclic, disulfide- and dithioether-containing opioid tetrapeptides: development of a ligand with high delta opioid receptor selectivity and affinity. , 1988, Life sciences.

[15]  Bruce R. Conklin,et al.  Structural elements of Gα subunits that interact with Gβγ, receptors, and effectors , 1993, Cell.

[16]  H. Bourne,et al.  How receptors talk to trimeric G proteins. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[17]  D. Ferguson,et al.  On the role of extracellular loops of opioid receptors in conferring ligand selectivity , 1995, FEBS letters.

[18]  P. Portoghese,et al.  Design of peptidomimetic delta opioid receptor antagonists using the message-address concept. , 1990, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  David T. Jones,et al.  A method for α‐helical integral membrane protein fold prediction , 1994 .

[20]  H. Mosberg,et al.  Modification of the Phe3 aromatic moiety in delta receptor-selective dermorphin/deltorphin-related tetrapeptides. Effects on opioid receptor binding. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[21]  D. Grandy,et al.  Analysis of selective binding epitopes for the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[22]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Andrei L. Lomize,et al.  Conformational Analysis of the δ Receptor-Selective, Cyclic Opioid Peptide, Tyr-cyclo[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13). Comparison of X-ray Crystallographic Structures, Molecular Mechanics Simulations, and 1H NMR Data , 1994 .

[24]  B. Gowen,et al.  Projection structure of an invertebrate rhodopsin. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.

[26]  K. Fukuda,et al.  Identification of the amino acid residues involved in selective agonist binding in the first extracellular loop of the δ‐ and μ‐opioid receptors , 1995 .

[27]  J. K. de Riel,et al.  Characterization of Irreversible Binding of -Funaltrexamine to the Cloned Rat Opioid Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  A. Lesk,et al.  The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[29]  Andrei L. Lomize,et al.  Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[30]  T L Blundell,et al.  The evolution and structure of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Receptors & channels.

[31]  P Herzyk,et al.  Automated method for modeling seven-helix transmembrane receptors from experimental data. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[32]  M. Froimowitz,et al.  Conformational search in enkephalin analogues containing a disulfide bond , 1990, Biopolymers.

[33]  J. Baldwin The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein‐coupled receptors. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[34]  C. Wahlestedt,et al.  Novel “Restoration of Function” Mutagenesis Strategy to Identify Amino Acids of the δ-Opioid Receptor Involved in Ligand Binding* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Combined use of stereospecific deuteration, NMR, distance geometry, and energy minimization for the conformational analysis of the highly .delta. opioid receptor selective peptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin , 1990 .

[36]  G. Schertler,et al.  Low resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin determined by electron cryo-microscopy. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[37]  D. Donnelly,et al.  Seven-helix receptors: structure and modelling , 1994 .

[38]  G. Heijne,et al.  Genome‐wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[39]  M Karplus,et al.  Dynamical search for bis-penicillamine enkephalin conformations. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[40]  P. Portoghese,et al.  A selective delta 1 opioid receptor agonist derived from oxymorphone. Evidence for separate recognition sites for delta 1 opioid receptor agonists and antagonists. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[42]  Robert C. Thompson,et al.  A Chimeric Study of the Molecular Basis of Affinity and Selectivity of the κ and the δ Opioid Receptors. , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  G H Loew,et al.  Theoretical study of the flexibility and solution conformation of the cyclic opioid peptides [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin and [D-Pen2,L-Pen5]enkephalin. , 1991, Molecular pharmacology.

[44]  A. Lomize,et al.  Development of a model for the delta opioid receptor pharmacophore. 1. Conformationally restricted Tyr1 replacements in the cyclic delta receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]OH (JOM-13). , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  B. Montgomery Pettitt,et al.  The conformational properties of the delta opioid peptide [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin in aqueous solution determined by NMR and energy minimization calculations , 1988 .