Cumulative-genetic plasticity, parenting and adolescent self-regulation.

BACKGROUND The capacity to control or regulate one's emotions, cognitions and behavior is central to competent functioning, with limitations in these abilities associated with developmental problems. Parenting appears to influence such self-regulation. Here the differential-susceptibility hypothesis is tested that the more putative 'plasticity alleles' adolescents carry, the more positively and negatively influenced they will be by, respectively, supportive and unsupportive parenting. METHODS One thousand, five hundred and eighty-six (1586) adolescents (n = 754 males; n = 832 females) enrolled in the American Add Health project were scored in terms of how many of 5 putative 'plasticity alleles' they carried - the 10R allele of DAT1, the A1 allele of DRD2, the 7R allele of DRD4, the short allele of 5HTTLPR, and the 2R/3R alleles of MAOA. Then the effect of the resultant index (ranging from 0 to 5) of cumulative-genetic plasticity in moderating effects of parenting on adolescent self-regulation was evaluated. RESULTS Consistent with differential susceptibility, the more plasticity alleles males (but not females) carried, the more and less self-regulation they manifested under, respectively, supportive and unsupportive parenting conditions. CONCLUSION Adolescent males appear to vary for genetic reasons in their susceptibility to parenting vis-à-vis self-regulation, perhaps due to epistatic and/or epigenetic processes. G×E research may benefit from compositing candidate genes. To afford comparative evaluation of differential-susceptibility vs. diathesis-stress models of environmental action, future G×E work should focus on positive as well as negative environmental conditions and developmental outcomes.

[1]  Kevin M. Beaver,et al.  Genetic risk, parent–child relations, and antisocial phenotypes in a sample of African-American males , 2010, Psychiatry Research.

[2]  A. Vazsonyi,et al.  Where self-control comes from: on the development of self-control and its relationship to deviance over time. , 2010, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Jay Belsky,et al.  Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  B. Franke,et al.  Dopamine and serotonin transporter genotypes moderate sensitivity to maternal expressed emotion: the case of conduct and emotional problems in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2009, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[5]  J. Belsky,et al.  Prenatal Smoking and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: DRD4-7R as a Plasticity Gene , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  Kevin M. Beaver,et al.  Evidence of Genetic and Environmental Effects On the Development of Low Self-Control , 2009 .

[7]  J. Belsky,et al.  The Nature (and Nurture?) of Plasticity in Early Human Development , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  J. Obradović,et al.  Individual Differences in Behavioral, Physiological, and Genetic Sensitivities to Contexts: Implications for Development and Adaptation , 2009, Developmental Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Belsky,et al.  Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? , 2009, Molecular Psychiatry.

[10]  S. Beach,et al.  Prevention effects moderate the association of 5-HTTLPR and youth risk behavior initiation: gene x environment hypotheses tested via a randomized prevention design. , 2009, Child development.

[11]  J. Belsky,et al.  Prenatal smoking and ADHD: DRD4-7R as a plasticity gene , 2009 .

[12]  M. McInnis,et al.  Psychiatric genetics: progress amid controversy , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  Effects of an attachment-based intervention on daily cortisol moderated by dopamine receptor D4: A randomized control trial on 1- to 3-year-olds screened for externalizing behavior , 2008, Development and Psychopathology.

[14]  E. Goode.  Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime. , 2008 .

[15]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Differential Susceptibility: Dopamine D4 Receptor Polymorphism (drd4 Vntr) Moderates Intervention Effects on Toddlers' Externalizing Behavior in a Randomized Controlled Trial Differential Susceptibility and Genetic Vulnerability , 2022 .

[16]  Cathi B. Propper,et al.  Bidirectional genetic and environmental influences on mother and child behavior: The family system as the unit of analyses , 2007, Development and Psychopathology.

[17]  Alfonso Troisi,et al.  Early Trauma and Increased Risk for Physical Aggression during Adulthood: The Moderating Role of MAOA Genotype , 2007, PloS one.

[18]  Martin H. Schmidt,et al.  Interacting effects of the dopamine transporter gene and psychosocial adversity on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms among 15-year-olds from a high-risk community sample. , 2007, Archives of general psychiatry.

[19]  J. Belsky.  Childhood experiences and reproductive strategies , 2007 .

[20]  James F. Leckman,et al.  Genes and behavior: nature–nurture interplay explained. , 2007 .

[21]  L. Lengua,et al.  Contextual risk and parenting as predictors of effortful control and social competence in preschool children. , 2007, Journal of applied developmental psychology.

[22]  K. Harris,et al.  The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) Twin Data , 2006, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[23]  A. Caspi,et al.  MAOA, maltreatment, and gene–environment interaction predicting children's mental health: new evidence and a meta-analysis , 2006, Molecular Psychiatry.

[24]  Linda M. Brzustowicz,et al.  MAOA and the “Cycle of Violence:” Childhood Abuse and Neglect, MAOA Genotype, and Risk for Violent and Antisocial Behavior , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[25]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Early Family Environment, Current Adversity, the Serotonin Transporter Promoter Polymorphism, and Depressive Symptomatology , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  Gene-environment interaction of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) and observed maternal insensitivity predicting externalizing behavior in preschoolers. , 2006, Developmental psychobiology.

[27]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Andreas Papassotiropoulos,et al.  Identification of a genetic cluster influencing memory performance and hippocampal activity in humans. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. , 2006 .

[30]  F. Champagne,et al.  The programming of individual differences in defensive responses and reproductive strategies in the rat through variations in maternal care , 2005, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[31]  P. Sham,et al.  A behavioural genomic analysis of DNA markers associated with general cognitive ability in 7-year-olds. , 2005, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[32]  Qing Zhou,et al.  Relations among positive parenting, children's effortful control, and externalizing problems: a three-wave longitudinal study. , 2005, Child development.

[33]  B. Ellis,et al.  Printed in the United States of America DOI: 10.10170S0954579405050145 , 2022 .

[34]  J. Hewitt,et al.  Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) and antisocial behaviors in the presence of childhood and adolescent maltreatment , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[35]  Jay Belsky,et al.  Differential Susceptibility to Rearing Influence: An Evolutionary Hypothesis and Some Evidence. , 2005 .

[36]  Chris S. Haley,et al.  Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Emotion-Related Regulation: An Emerging Construct , 2004 .

[38]  Bogdan Draganski,et al.  Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training , 2004, Nature.

[39]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity : functional and conceptual approaches , 2004 .

[40]  H. Cordell.  Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[41]  A. Caspi,et al.  Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children , 2002, Science.

[42]  T. Pratt,et al.  THE EMPIRICAL STATUS OF GOTTFREDSON AND HIRSCHI'S GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME: A META‐ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[43]  J. Riskind,et al.  Vulnerability to Psychopathology: A Biosocial Model , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[44]  E E Maccoby,et al.  Parenting and its effects on children: on reading and misreading behavior genetics. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  P. Bearman,et al.  Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. , 1997 .

[46]  Jay Belsky,et al.  Variation in Susceptibility to Environmental Influence: An Evolutionary Argument , 1997 .

[47]  E P Noble,et al.  The D2 Dopamine Receptor (DRD2) Gene and Family Stress; Interactive Effects on Cognitive Functions in Children , 1997, Behavior genetics.

[48]  Trish,et al.  Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. , 1997, JAMA.

[49]  J. Weisz,et al.  Parental caregiving and child externalizing behavior in nonclinical samples: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  M. Bornstein.  Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and causal interpretations. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .