Perceived Influence of Adoption of Personal Electronic Response Systems by Students With and Without Disabilities and Limited English Proficiency in Small Social Work Classes

This study investigates the perceived influence of adoption of personal electronic response systems (clickers) on undergraduate and graduate social work education by students with and without disabilities and limited English proficiency (LEP). A mixed methods exploratory quasi-experimental (posttest only) design was used in this study of instructional technology in social work education. Self-report questionnaires were completed by 30 undergraduate and graduate students, and follow-up telephonic interviews were conducted with a subsample of 6 students with disabilities or LEP. Correlates examined were student status, level of life stress, and usage status. Qualitative themes emerged suggesting that students with LEP and with varied sensory, cognitive, and physical disabilities found clickers to be helpful in increasing their class participation and as assistive technology to support their learning. Student status and achievement associations with clicker use perception were explored to determine whether these important student characteristics suggested a profile of clicker user attitudes. Quantitative findings suggested that overall perceptions of clicker use were positively correlated with student status (r = .53; p = .03), with graduate students holding more favorable opinions than undergraduates, and that first-time clicker use was inversely correlated with Grade Point Average (GPA) (r = −.53; p = .03 for current GPA and r = −.57; p = .04 for cumulative GPA), suggesting that first-time clicker users had higher GPAs than nonfirst-time users likely accounted for by the higher required GPAs of graduate students, who were more likely to be first-time users. No significant correlation was found between these stressors and perceptions toward adoption of classroom electronic response technology.

[1]  Meghan D. McAuliffe,et al.  Efficacy of Personal Response Systems (“Clickers”) in Large, Introductory Psychology Classes , 2008 .

[2]  Robert R Prewitt,et al.  Using "clickers" in the classroom to increase the level of student interaction , 2008 .

[3]  J. Stowell,et al.  Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion , 2007 .

[4]  C. Brewer Near Real-Time Assessment of Student Learning and Understanding in Biology Courses , 2004 .

[5]  Edwin R. Griff,et al.  Early identification of at-risk students using a personal response system , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  J. Wakefield Aristotle as Sociobiologist: The "Function of a Human Being" Argument, Black Box Essentialism, and the Concept of Mental Disorder , 2000 .

[7]  Andreas Panayiotidis,et al.  Changing the nature of lectures using a personal response system , 2009 .

[8]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[9]  Katherine E. Masyn,et al.  Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study , 2007 .

[10]  Kalyani Premkumar,et al.  Rules of engagement–12 tips for successful use of “clickers” in the classroom , 2008, Medical teacher.

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[12]  Stephanie Cole Quit Surfing and Start "Clicking": One Professor's Effort to Combat the Problems of Teaching the U.S. Survey in a Large Lecture Hall , 2010 .

[13]  Andrew Quinn An Exploratory Study of Opinions on Clickers and Class Participation From Students of Human Behavior in the Social Environment , 2010 .

[14]  Clay T. Graybeal Evidence for the Art of Social Work , 2007 .

[15]  D. Skiba Got large lecture hall classes? Use clickers. , 2006, Nursing education perspectives.

[16]  Robert S. Feldman,et al.  Promoting Active Learning Using Individual Response Technology in Large Introductory Psychology Classes , 2007 .

[17]  Rowena Santiago,et al.  Audience Response Systems: Using “Clickers” to Enhance BSW Education , 2011 .

[18]  N. Sanjay Rebello,et al.  Impact of a Classroom Interaction System on Student Learning , 2007 .

[19]  Joan E. Hughes,et al.  The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experiences in Forming Technology-Integrated Pedagogy , 2005 .

[20]  B. Golub,et al.  How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best Response Dynamics , 2012 .

[21]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Exploring the Characteristics of Innovation Adoption in Social Networks: Structure, Homophily, and Strategy , 2013, Entropy.

[22]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .