A Spatial Domain Object Separability Based no-Reference Image Quality Measure using mean and variance

In many modern image processing applications determining quality of the image is one of the most challenging tasks. Researchers working in the field of image quality assessment design algorithms for measuring and quantifying image quality. The human eye can identify the difference between a good quality image and a noisy image by simply looking at the image, but designing a computer algorithm to automatically determine the quality of an image is a very challenging task. In this paper, we propose an image quality measure using the concept of object separability. We define object separability using variance. Two objects are very well separated if variance of individual object is less and mean pixel values of neighboring objects are very different. Degradation in images can be due to a number of reasons like additive noises, quantization defects, sampling defects, etc. The proposed no-reference image quality measure will determine quality of degraded images and differentiate between good and degraded images.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Modern Image Quality Assessment , 2006, Modern Image Quality Assessment.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[10]  Paul S. Fisher,et al.  Image quality measures and their performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Blind measurement of blocking artifacts in images , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.