Distinct neural networks for target feature versus dimension changes in visual search, as revealed by EEG and fMRI

In visual search, responses are slowed, from one trial to the next, both when the target dimension changes (e.g., from a color target to a size target) and when the target feature changes (e.g., from a red target to a green target) relative to being repeated across trials. The present study examined whether such feature and dimension switch costs can be attributed to the same underlying mechanism(s). Contrary to this contention, an EEG study showed that feature changes influenced visual selection of the target (i.e., delayed N2pc onset), whereas dimension changes influenced the later process of response selection (i.e., delayed s-LRP onset). An fMRI study provided convergent evidence for the two-system view: Compared with repetitions, feature changes led to increased activation in the occipital cortex, and superior and inferior parietal lobules, which have been implicated in spatial attention. By contrast, dimension changes led to activation of a fronto-posterior network that is primarily linked with response selection (i.e., pre-motor cortex, supplementary motor area and frontal areas). Taken together, the results suggest that feature and dimension switch costs are based on different processes. Specifically, whereas target feature changes delay attention shifts to the target, target dimension changes interfere with later response selection operations.

[1]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Expectation and repetition effects in searching for featural singletons in very brief displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Improved multitasking following prefrontal tDCS , 2013, Cortex.

[4]  M. Chun,et al.  Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex , 2006, Psychological research.

[5]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines in Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, and Polysomnography. , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[7]  H J Müller,et al.  Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: an event-related fMRI study. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  A. Cohen,et al.  Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  Isolation of a Central Bottleneck of Information Processing with Time-Resolved fMRI , 2006, Neuron.

[10]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  S. Wise,et al.  Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  N. J. Herrod,et al.  Maintaining and shifting attention within left or right hemifield. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  S. Hackley,et al.  Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  A Unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Brain electrical correlates of dimensional weighting: an ERP study. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Testing a postselectional account of across-dimension switch costs , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  S. Pollmann,et al.  A Fronto-Posterior Network Involved in Visual Dimension Changes , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Carl B. Watt,et al.  The signature hypothesis: Co-localizations of neuroactive substances as anatomical probes for circuitry analyses , 1985, Vision Research.

[24]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The Lateralized Readiness Potential , 2003 .

[25]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  René Marois,et al.  Disrupting Prefrontal Cortex Prevents Performance Gains from Sensory-Motor Training , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Dimension-based attention modulates early visual processing. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  R. Passingham,et al.  The left parietal cortex and motor attention , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  M. Eimer,et al.  Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  The stage of priming: Are intertrial repetition effects attentional or decisional? , 2008, Vision Research.

[33]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Attentional Capture Does Not Depend on Feature Similarity, but on Target-Nontarget Relations , 2013, Psychological science.

[34]  H. Müller,et al.  Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Vision Research.

[35]  T. A. Kelley,et al.  Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[38]  A. Hillstrom Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The Roles of Feature-Specific Task Set and Bottom-Up Salience in Attentional Capture : An ERP Study , 2009 .

[40]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  F. Tong,et al.  Training Improves Multitasking Performance by Increasing the Speed of Information Processing in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[42]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Jürgen Kayser,et al.  In search of the Rosetta Stone for scalp EEG: Converging on reference-free techniques , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  T Kumada,et al.  Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  FSL , 2012, NeuroImage.

[46]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[47]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .

[49]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[50]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Selective and interactive neural correlates of visual dimension changes and response changes , 2006, NeuroImage.

[51]  C. Frith,et al.  Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. , 2000, Science.

[52]  Dragan Rangelov,et al.  Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  H. Müller,et al.  Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? , 2006 .

[54]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Simply shapely: Relative, not absolute shapes are primed in pop-out search , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[55]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[56]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.

[57]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[58]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Vision Research.

[59]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .

[60]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[61]  Paul B. Johnson,et al.  Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[62]  Dragan Rangelov,et al.  Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[63]  Kathrin Finke,et al.  Event-related potentials dissociate perceptual from response-related age effects in visual search , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[64]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: Does motor response or response feature matter? , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[66]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[67]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[68]  Robert M. McPeek,et al.  Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system , 1999, Vision Research.

[69]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.