Police Lie Detection Accuracy: The Effect of Lie Scenario

Although most people are not better than chance in detecting deception, some groups of police professionals have demonstrated significant lie detection accuracy. One reason for this difference may be that the types of lies police are asked to judge in scientific experiments often do not represent the types of lies they see in their profession. Across 23 studies, involving 31 different police groups in eight countries, police officers tested with lie detection scenarios using high stakes lies (i.e., the lie was personally involving and/or resulted in substantial rewards or punishments for the liar) were significantly more accurate than law enforcement officials tested with low stakes lies. Face validity and construct validity of various lie scenarios are differentiated.

[1]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  To Catch a Liar: Challenges for Research in Lie Detection Training , 2003 .

[2]  David C. Funder,et al.  Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. , 1999 .

[3]  Ray Bull,et al.  Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Carmen Herrero,et al.  Police officers' credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability , 2004 .

[6]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real-life police interviews , 2006 .

[7]  A. Vrij,et al.  Detecting lies in young children, adolescents and adults , 2006 .

[8]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives , 1994 .

[9]  P. Ekman,et al.  The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  A. Vrij,et al.  Cues to Deception and Ability to Detect Lies as a Function of Police Interview Styles , 2007, Law and human behavior.

[11]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Accuracy of Deception Judgments , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  G. D. Bond,et al.  Deception Detection Expertise , 2008, Law and human behavior.

[13]  Paul Ekman,et al.  The wizards of deception detection. , 2004 .

[14]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video , 2004 .

[15]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[16]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Who killed my relative? police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies , 2001 .

[18]  Ray Bull,et al.  Police officers' ability to detect deceit: The benefit of indirect deception detection measures , 2001 .

[19]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Police officers ability to detect deception in high stakes situations and in repeated lie detection tests , 2006 .

[20]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity , 1999 .

[21]  Mark A. deTurck,et al.  The Behavioral Correlates of Sanctioned and Unsanctioned Deceptive Communication , 1998 .

[22]  R. Koestner,et al.  Anchoring in the detection of deception and leakage. , 1984 .

[23]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence , 2005 .

[24]  R. Kraut,et al.  Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. , 1980 .

[25]  Pär Anders Granhag,et al.  The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts , 2005 .

[26]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. , 1982 .

[27]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. , 1983 .

[28]  A. Vrij,et al.  Credibility judgements of detectives: the impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills, and physical characteristics on impression formation. , 1993, The Journal of social psychology.

[29]  M. Orne,et al.  Effects of heightened motivation on the detection of deception. , 1963 .

[30]  Maureen O’Sullivan,et al.  Unicorns or Tiger Woods: Are Lie Detection Experts Myths or Rarities? A Response to On Lie Detection “Wizards” by Bond and Uysal , 2007, Law and human behavior.

[31]  Ray Bull,et al.  Looking through the eyes of an accurate lie detector , 2006 .

[32]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Experimentation in social psychology. , 1998 .

[33]  Dr Aldert Vrij,et al.  Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies , 1997 .

[34]  Paul Ekman,et al.  The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit , 1988 .

[35]  Stephen Porter,et al.  Truth, Lies, and Videotape: An Investigation of the Ability of Federal Parole Officers to Detect Deception , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[36]  Mark G. Frank.  Research Methods in Detecting Deception Research , 2008 .

[37]  P. Ekman,et al.  Who can catch a liar? , 1991, The American psychologist.

[38]  B. Depaulo,et al.  On-the-Job Experience and Skill at Detecting Deception1 , 1986 .

[39]  Ray Bull,et al.  Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order , 2008, Law and human behavior.

[40]  Günter Köhnken,et al.  Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? , 1987 .

[41]  Michael G. Aamodt,et al.  Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. , 2006 .

[42]  P. Ekman,et al.  Smiles when lying. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  P. Ekman,et al.  Reply scoring and reporting: A response to bond (2008) , 2008 .

[44]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Baseline Familiarity in Lie Detection. , 1995 .

[45]  Paul Ekman,et al.  A Few Can Catch a Liar , 1999 .

[46]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  “I’d Know a False Confession if I Saw One”: A Comparative Study of College Students and Police Investigators , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[47]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[48]  Maureen O’Sullivan,et al.  Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008). , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  “He's guilty!”: Investigator Bias in Judgments of Truth and Deception , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[50]  A. Vrij,et al.  Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer , 2001 .

[51]  E. Elaad.  Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies , 2003 .

[52]  E. Brunswik,et al.  Psychology as a Science of Objective Relations , 1937, Philosophy of Science.

[53]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Strategic Use of Evidence During Police Interviews: When Training to Detect Deception Works , 2006, Law and human behavior.

[55]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .