Hyperspectral sub-pixel target detection using hybrid algorithms and Physics Based Modeling

This thesis develops a new hybrid target detection algorithm called the Physics Based-Structured InFeasibility Target-detector (PB-SIFT) which incorporates Physics Based Modeling (PBM) along with a new Structured Infeasibility Projector (SIP) metric. Traditional matched filters are susceptible to leakage or false alarms due to bright or saturated pixels that appear target-like to hyperspectral detection algo rithms but are not truly target. This detector mitigates against such false alarms. More often than not, detection algorithms are applied to atmospherically com pensated hyperspectral imagery. Rather than compensate the imagery, we take the opposite approach by using a physics based model to generate permutations ofwhat the target might look like as seen by the sensor in radiance space. The development and status of such a method is presented as applied to the generation of target spaces. The generated target spaces are designed to fully encompass image tar get pixels while using a limited number of input model parameters. Evaluation of such target spaces shows that they can reproduce a HYDICE image target pixel spectrum to less than 1% RMS error (equivalent reflectance) in the visible and less iv than 6% in the near IR. Background spaces are modeled using a linear subspace (structured) approach characterized by basis vectors found by using the maximum distance method (MaxD). The SIP is developed along with a Physics Based Orthogonal Projection Op erator (PBosp) which produces a 2 dimensional decision space. Results from the HYDICE FR I data set show that the physics based approach, along with the PBSIFT algorithm, can out perform the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) and Spectral Matched Filter (SMF) on both exposed and fully concealed man-made targets found in hyperspectral imagery. Furthermore, the PB-SIFT algorithm performs as good (if not better) than the Mixture Tuned Matched Filter (MTMF).

[1]  G. Shaw,et al.  Signal processing for hyperspectral image exploitation , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[2]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[3]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[4]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  The MODIS 2.1-μm channel-correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral subpixel target detection using the linear mixing model , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Peter Bajorski,et al.  Geometric basis-vector selection methods and subpixel target detection as applied to hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[7]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Spectral imaging system analytical model for subpixel object detection , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Daniel Schläpfer,et al.  Atmospheric Precorrected Differential Absorption Technique to Retrieve Columnar Water Vapor , 1998 .

[9]  Dimitris G. Manolakis Overview of algorithms for hyperspectral target detection: theory and practice , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Ronald L. Graham,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Determining the Convex Hull of a Finite Planar Set , 1972, Inf. Process. Lett..

[12]  J. Boardman,et al.  Leveraging the High Dimensionality of AVIRIS Data for improved Sub-Pixel Target i Unmixing and Rejection of False Positives : Mixture Tuned Matched Filtering , 1998 .

[13]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[14]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Physics-based model acquisition and identification in airborne spectral images , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[15]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive subspace detectors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral adaptive matched-filter detectors: practical performance comparison , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[17]  J. B. Lee,et al.  Enhancement of high spectral resolution remote-sensing data by a noise-adjusted principal components transform , 1990 .

[18]  F. P. Preparata,et al.  Convex hulls of finite sets of points in two and three dimensions , 1977, CACM.

[19]  R. McDonald Opening the cold war sky to the public: declassifying satellite reconnaissance imagery , 1995 .

[20]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[21]  W. Farrand Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d'Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique , 1997 .

[22]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[23]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  John R. Schott,et al.  Comparison of basis-vector selection methods for target and background subspaces as applied to subpixel target detection , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[25]  J. Boardman,et al.  Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data: in Summaries , 1995 .

[26]  Glenn Healey,et al.  Models and methods for automated material identification in hyperspectral imagery acquired under unknown illumination and atmospheric conditions , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Airborne Scanning Spectrometer for Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, Water Vapor, and Surface Properties , 1996 .

[28]  K. Hirsch A COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS FOR DETERMINING PRECIPITABLE WATER VAPOR CONTENT FROM MULTI-SPECTRAL DATA , 2001 .

[29]  E. J. Kelly An Adaptive Detection Algorithm , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[30]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[31]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Matched subspace detectors , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[32]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[33]  Alan P. Schaum,et al.  Application of stochastic mixing models to hyperspectral detection problems , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[34]  Gail P. Anderson,et al.  Atmospheric correction for shortwave spectral imagery based on MODTRAN4 , 1999, Optics & Photonics.