A new statistically based autoconversion rate parameterization for use in large-scale models

[1] The autoconversion rate is a key process for the formation of precipitation in warm clouds. In climate models, physical processes such as autoconversion rate, which are calculated from grid mean values, are biased, because they do not take subgrid variability into account. Recently, statistical cloud schemes have been introduced in large-scale models to account for partially cloud-covered grid boxes. However, these schemes do not include the in-cloud variability in their parameterizations. In this paper, a new statistically based autoconversion rate considering the in-cloud variability is introduced and tested in three cases using the Canadian Single Column Model (SCM) of the global climate model. The results show that the new autoconversion rate improves the model simulation, especially in terms of liquid water path in all three case studies.

[1]  R. Smith.  A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model , 1990 .

[2]  H. Treut,et al.  Precipitation and radiation modeling in a general circulation model: Introduction of cloud microphysical processes , 1995 .

[3]  H. Kapitza,et al.  3D mesoscale numerical studies of cirrus and stratus clouds by their time and space evolution , 1992 .

[4]  K. D. Beheng.  A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion processes , 1994 .

[5]  P. Minnis,et al.  Cloud and radiative fields derived from GOES‐8 during SUCCESS and the ARM‐UAV spring 1996 flight series , 1998 .

[6]  P. Guest,et al.  Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower at SHEBA: Near‐surface conditions and surface energy budget , 2002 .

[7]  M. H. Zhang,et al.  Objective Analysis of ARM IOP Data: Method and Sensitivity , 1999 .

[8]  Ulrike Lohmann,et al.  Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model , 1996 .

[9]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large‐scale models. I: Description and evaluation of the microphysical processes , 1997 .

[10]  N. McFarlane,et al.  A New Second-Order Turbulence Closure Scheme for the Planetary Boundary Layer , 1997 .

[11]  J. Curry,et al.  Cloud Resolving Simulations of Mixed-Phase Arctic Stratus Observed during BASE: Sensitivity to Concentration of Ice Crystals and Large-Scale Heat and Moisture Advection , 2000 .

[12]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[13]  M. Shupe,et al.  An annual cycle of Arctic cloud characteristics observed by radar and lidar at SHEBA , 2002 .

[14]  David A. Randall,et al.  Single-Column Models and Cloud Ensemble Models as Links between Observations and Climate Models , 1996 .

[15]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Comparison of cloud liquid water paths derived from in situ and microwave radiometer data taken during the SHEBA/FIREACE , 2001 .

[16]  J. C. Liljegren,et al.  TWO-CHANNEL MICROWAVE RADIOMETER FOR OBSERVATIONS OF TOTAL COLUMN PRECIPITABLE WATER VAPOR AND CLOUD LIQUID WATER PATH , 1994 .

[17]  S. Klein,et al.  Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large‐scale models , 2000 .

[18]  J. Royer,et al.  A statistical cloud scheme for use in an AGCM , 1993 .

[19]  G. Watts,et al.  Climate Change 1995 , 1998 .

[20]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[21]  J. Morcrette.  Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system , 1991 .

[22]  Donald P. Garber,et al.  Cloud Properties Derived From GOES-7 for Spring 1994 ARM Intensive Observing Period Using Version 1.0.0 of ARM Satellite Data Analysis Program , 1995 .

[23]  J. Deardorff,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Condensation in Models of Nonprecipitating Clouds , 1977 .

[24]  D. Randall,et al.  Evaluation of Statistically Based Cloudiness Parameterizations Used in Climate Models , 1996 .

[25]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Comparing Different Cloud Schemes of a Single Column Model by Using Mesoscale Forcing and Nudging Technique , 1999 .

[26]  James J. Hack,et al.  A comparison of single column model simulations of summertime midlatitude continental convection , 2000 .

[27]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Constrained Variational Analysis of Sounding Data Based on Column-Integrated Budgets of Mass, Heat, Moisture, and Momentum: Approach and Application to ARM Measurements. , 1997 .

[28]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Modelling Boundary-Layer Clouds With a Statistical Cloud Scheme and a Second-Order Turbulence Closure , 2001 .

[29]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  On the “tuning” of autoconversion parameterizations in climate models , 2000 .

[30]  L. Rotstayn.  A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large‐scale models. II: Comparison of modelled and observed climatological fields , 1998 .

[31]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Simulations of ice clouds during FIRE ACE using the CCCMA single‐column model , 2001 .