Social business as an entrepreneurship model in emerging economy

Purpose Despite its immense potentials as a sustainable and innovative means to solve specific social problems, the basic concept of the social business model (SBM) advanced by Professor Muhammad Yunus remains unclear to many. There exists no literature that objectively compares this model from empowerment and economic growth perspectives with other seemingly similar concepts, such as social enterprise, non-governmental organization (NGO) and corporate social responsibility. Although many NGOs have been showing increasing interest towards the adoption of the SBM to minimize social problems sustainably, lack of conceptual clarity of the model limits the scope of its adoption in addressing social issues. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a systematic search, analysis and review of literature. It has made use of narrative synthesis of relevant literature on a diverse range of socially oriented models, frameworks and interventions. Findings This study identified five key aspects of social business, namely: business’s mission and outcomes, characteristics, operation, resource utilization and environmental considerations. Based on these five key aspects one may like to infer that unlike other social interventions, the alignment of SBM is specific to empowerment of disadvantaged people leading to sustainable economic growth. Analyzing a range of social business interventions in a developing country, Bangladesh, through the lens five key aspects demonstrates that social business is the most efficient way to sustainably maximize the social benefits and minimize specific social issues poverty of the people affected. Originality/value This study discusses the scopes of adopting SBM for the socially responsible organizations for sustainable empowerment and economic growth in emerging economies.

[1]  Najmul Hasan,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of the Application of Information Communication Technology for Visually Impaired People , 2016, International Journal of Disability Management.

[2]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments , 2009, Empirical Software Engineering.

[3]  Lorie A. Kloda,et al.  A systematic literature review of 10years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men? , 2012, PAIN.

[4]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  mHealth Technologies for Chronic Diseases and Elders: A Systematic Review , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  D. Menzies Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. , 2011, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Physical therapy.

[7]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid - Implications for MNEs? , 2014 .

[8]  Adriana Rejc Buhovac,et al.  Making Sustainability Work : Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts , 2017 .

[9]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  Heiko Gebauer,et al.  When one business model is not enough for a social business , 2017 .

[11]  Illhoi Yoo,et al.  A Systematic Review of Healthcare Applications for Smartphones , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[12]  Bertrand Moingeon,et al.  Building Social Business Models: Lessons from the Grameen Experience , 2010 .

[13]  Muhammad Yunus,et al.  Creating a World Without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism , 2007 .

[14]  G. Heal,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework , 2005 .

[15]  David P. Baron,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[16]  J. Logsdon,et al.  How corporate social responsibility pays off , 1996 .

[17]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Accessibility to electronic communication for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic search and review of empirical evidence , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..

[19]  J. Post,et al.  Business models for people, planet (& profits): exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation , 2013 .

[20]  Anica Zeyen,et al.  Mission, finance, and innovation: the similarities and differences between social entrepreneurship and social business , 2014 .

[21]  Rob Atenstaedt,et al.  Word cloud analysis of the BJGP. , 2012, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[22]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[23]  Jill R. Kickul,et al.  Social Business Education: An Interview With Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus , 2012 .

[24]  Changhwan Shin A conceptual approach to the relationships between the social economy, social welfare, and social innovation , 2016 .

[25]  Pradeep Kumar Ray,et al.  Adaptive policy framework: A systematic review , 2013, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews , 2009 .

[27]  Laura Michelini,et al.  New business models for creating shared value , 2012 .