REDUCED ORDER MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC APPLICATIONS , LOADS ANDMDO

This work gives an overview of reduced order model (ROM) applications employed within the context of the DLR Digital-X project. The ROM methodology has found widespread application in fluid dynamics. In its direct application to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) it seeks to reduce the computational complexity of a problem by reducing the number of degrees of freedom rather than simplifying the physical model. Here, parametric aerodynamic ROMs are used to provide pressure distributions based on highfidelity CFD, but at lower evaluation time and storage than the original CFD model. ROMs for steady aerodynamic applications are presented. We consider ROMs combining proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and Isomap, which is a manifold learning method, with interpolation methods as well as physics-based ROMs, where an approximate solution is found in the POD-subspace or non-linear manifold by minimizing the corresponding steady or unsteady flow-solver residual. The issue of how to train the ROM with high-fidelity CFD data is also addressed. The steady ROMs are used to predict the static aeroelastic loads in a multidisciplinary design and optimization (MDO) context, where the structural model is to be sized for the (aerodynamic) loads. They are also used in a process where an a priori identification of the critical load cases is of interest and the sheer number of load cases to be considered does not lend itself to high-fidelity CFD. We also show an approach combining correction of a linear loads analysis model using steady, rigid CFD solutions at various Mach numbers and angles of attack with a ROM of the corrected Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients (AICs). This integrates the results into a complete loads analysis model preserving aerodynamic nonlinearities while allowing fast evaluation across all model parameters. Thus, correction for the major nonlinearities, e.g. depending on Mach number and angle of attack combines with the linearity of the baseline model to yield a large domain of validity across all flow parameters at the expense of a relatively small number of CFD solutions. The different ROM methods are applied to a 3D test case of a transonic wing-body transport aircraft configuration.

[1]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Model order reduction for steady aerodynamics of high-lift configurations , 2014 .

[2]  T. P. Kalman,et al.  Correction factory techniques for improving aerodynamic prediction methods , 1976 .

[3]  Lawrence Cayton,et al.  Algorithms for manifold learning , 2005 .

[4]  W. Habashi,et al.  Multi-parameter analysis of aero-icing problems via proper orthogonal decomposition and multidimensional interpolation , 2013 .

[5]  J. Brink-Spalink,et al.  Correction of unsteady aerodynamic influence coefficients using experimental or CFD data , 2000 .

[6]  R. Zimmermann,et al.  Interpolation-based reduced-order modelling for steady transonic flows via manifold learning , 2014 .

[7]  J. J. Moré,et al.  Levenberg--Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory , 1977 .

[8]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Non-linear reduced order models for steady aerodynamics , 2010, ICCS.

[9]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  H. Wendland,et al.  Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functions , 2001 .

[11]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[12]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .

[13]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis , 2014, ArXiv.

[14]  M. Damodaran,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Extensions For Parametric Applications in Transonic Aerodynamics , 2003 .

[15]  Ralf Heinrich,et al.  The DLR TAU-Code: Recent Applications in Research and Industry , 2006 .

[16]  H. Faßbender,et al.  Model Order Reduction for Unsteady Aerodynamic Applications , 2013 .

[17]  Dayton Hartley,et al.  AN ENHANCED CORRECTION FACTOR TECHNIQUE FOR AERODYNAMIC INFLUENCE COEFFICIENT METHODS , 1999 .

[18]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[19]  Hariharan Narayanan,et al.  Sample Complexity of Testing the Manifold Hypothesis , 2010, NIPS.

[20]  W. Sharpe Springer Handbook of Experimental Solid Mechanics , 2008 .

[21]  P. Holmes,et al.  Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 1996 .

[22]  A. DeBlois,et al.  Development of a Multilevel Multidisciplinary-Optimization Capability for an Industrial Environment , 2013 .

[23]  J. Wild AeroForce - Thrust/Drag Bookkeeping and Aerodynamic Force Breakdown over Components , 1999 .

[24]  Siep Weiland,et al.  Missing Point Estimation in Models Described by Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  P. Astrid,et al.  Reduction of process simulation models : a proper orthogonal decomposition approach , 2004 .

[26]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[27]  V. T. Rajan,et al.  Optimality of the Delaunay triangulation in Rd , 1991, SCG '91.

[28]  C. Ilic,et al.  DLR project Digital-X: towards virtual aircraft design and flight testing based on high-fidelity methods , 2015, CEAS Aeronautical Journal.

[29]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Reduced order modeling of steady flows subject to aerodynamic constraints , 2014 .

[30]  Matthias Schulze,et al.  A Fully Automatic Structural Optimization Framework to Determine Critical Loads , 2016 .

[31]  P. Beran,et al.  Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics , 2004 .

[32]  Gertjan Looye,et al.  A Variable, Fully Flexible Dynamic Response Tool for Special Investigations (VarLoads) , 2003 .

[33]  Alexander P. Kuleshov,et al.  Tangent Bundle Manifold Learning via Grassmann&Stiefel Eigenmaps , 2012, ArXiv.

[34]  R. Penrose On best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations , 1956, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[35]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Investigation of non-linear projection for POD based reduced order models for Aerodynamics , 2001 .

[36]  Bjoern Nagel,et al.  Preliminary Aircraft Design in a Collaborative Multidisciplinary Design Environment , 2011 .

[37]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[38]  Karen Willcox,et al.  An Accelerated Greedy Missing Point Estimation Procedure , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[39]  Norbert Kroll,et al.  The DLR Flow Solver TAU - Status and Recent Algorithmic Developments , 2014 .

[40]  Thomas Franz,et al.  Reduced-order modeling for steady transonic flows via manifold learning , 2015 .

[41]  M. Fossati Evaluation of aerodynamic loads via reduced order methodology , 2015 .

[42]  N. Nguyen,et al.  An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations , 2004 .

[43]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Improved extrapolation of steady turbulent aerodynamics using a non-linear POD-based reduced order model , 2012, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).