Evidence Evaluation Process and Management of Potential Conflicts of Interest: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.
暂无分享,去创建一个
R. Neumar | L. Morrison | D. Atkins | J. Soar | G. Perkins | J. Nolan | J. Finn | M. Wyckoff | M. Mancini | E. Lang | J. Billi | P. Morley | Tzong-Luen Wang | M. Welsford | T. Olasveengen | Y. Rabi | I. Maconochie | W. Montgomery | R. Greif | R. Aickin | E. Singletary
[1] R. Neumar,et al. Executive Summary: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2020, Circulation.
[2] R. Neumar,et al. Executive Summary 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations☆ , 2020, Resuscitation.
[3] D. Zideman,et al. Early or First Aid Administration Versus Late or In-hospital Administration of Aspirin for Non-traumatic Adult Chest Pain: A Systematic Review , 2020, Cureus.
[4] H. Schünemann,et al. Guideline groups should make recommendations even if the evidence is considered insufficient , 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal.
[5] Jeffrey L Pellegrino,et al. 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task , 2019, Circulation.
[6] G. Guyatt,et al. GRADE guidelines 26: Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[7] J. Soar. 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2019, Resuscitation.
[8] Natalie S Blencowe,et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2019, BMJ.
[9] Gordon H. Guyatt,et al. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] G. Guyatt,et al. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[11] P. Kudenchuk,et al. CHEST COMPRESSION COMPONENTS (RATE, DEPTH, CHEST WALL RECOIL AND LEANING): A SCOPING REVIEW. , 2019, Resuscitation.
[12] G. Collins,et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. , 2019, Annals of internal medicine.
[13] R. Neumar,et al. 2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2018, Circulation.
[14] Naoki Shimizu,et al. 2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2018, Resuscitation.
[15] J. McGowan,et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[16] J. Nolan,et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: A systematic review. , 2018, Resuscitation.
[17] L. Morrison,et al. COSCA (Core Outcome Set for Cardiac Arrest) in Adults: An Advisory Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. , 2018, Resuscitation.
[18] R. Neumar,et al. ILCOR Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Consensus Statement. , 2018, Resuscitation.
[19] R. Neumar,et al. ILCOR Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Consensus Statement. , 2018, Circulation.
[20] G. Guyatt,et al. [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines]. , 2018, Gaceta sanitaria.
[21] P. Kudenchuk,et al. 2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2017, Circulation.
[22] P. Kudenchuk,et al. 2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2017, Resuscitation.
[23] R. Neumar,et al. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation-Review of the last 25 years and vision for the future. , 2017, Resuscitation.
[24] G. Perkins,et al. Effectiveness of different compression-to-ventilation methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review. , 2017, Resuscitation.
[25] Mohammed T Ansari,et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[26] Alonso Carrasco-Labra,et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[27] G. Guyatt,et al. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[28] M. Hernán,et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.
[29] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction , 2016, British Medical Journal.
[30] G. Guyatt,et al. World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[31] R. Neumar,et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Resuscitation.
[32] L. Morrison,et al. Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Management of Conflicts of Interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Circulation.
[33] L. Morrison,et al. Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Resuscitation.
[34] G. Guyatt,et al. Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[35] R. Neumar,et al. Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Circulation.
[36] D. Moher,et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[37] C. Chew‐Graham,et al. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.
[38] L. Morrison,et al. The formula for survival in resuscitation. , 2013, Resuscitation.
[39] Elie A Akl,et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[40] Howard Balshem,et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[41] J. Nolan,et al. Conflict of Interest Management Before, During, and After the 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations , 2005, Circulation.
[42] M. Shuster,et al. Part 4: Conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Resuscitation.
[43] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.
[44] Gordon H Guyatt,et al. GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[45] H. Arksey,et al. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .