Evidence Evaluation Process and Management of Potential Conflicts of Interest: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

[1]  R. Neumar,et al.  Executive Summary: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  R. Neumar,et al.  Executive Summary 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations☆ , 2020, Resuscitation.

[3]  D. Zideman,et al.  Early or First Aid Administration Versus Late or In-hospital Administration of Aspirin for Non-traumatic Adult Chest Pain: A Systematic Review , 2020, Cureus.

[4]  H. Schünemann,et al.  Guideline groups should make recommendations even if the evidence is considered insufficient , 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[5]  Jeffrey L Pellegrino,et al.  2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task , 2019, Circulation.

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines 26: Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. , 2019, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  J. Soar 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2019, Resuscitation.

[8]  Natalie S Blencowe,et al.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2019, BMJ.

[9]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. , 2018, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  CHEST COMPRESSION COMPONENTS (RATE, DEPTH, CHEST WALL RECOIL AND LEANING): A SCOPING REVIEW. , 2019, Resuscitation.

[12]  G. Collins,et al.  PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. , 2019, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  R. Neumar,et al.  2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2018, Circulation.

[14]  Naoki Shimizu,et al.  2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2018, Resuscitation.

[15]  J. McGowan,et al.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation , 2018, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  J. Nolan,et al.  Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: A systematic review. , 2018, Resuscitation.

[17]  L. Morrison,et al.  COSCA (Core Outcome Set for Cardiac Arrest) in Adults: An Advisory Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. , 2018, Resuscitation.

[18]  R. Neumar,et al.  ILCOR Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Consensus Statement. , 2018, Resuscitation.

[19]  R. Neumar,et al.  ILCOR Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Consensus Statement. , 2018, Circulation.

[20]  G. Guyatt,et al.  [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines]. , 2018, Gaceta sanitaria.

[21]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2017, Circulation.

[22]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary. , 2017, Resuscitation.

[23]  R. Neumar,et al.  The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation-Review of the last 25 years and vision for the future. , 2017, Resuscitation.

[24]  G. Perkins,et al.  Effectiveness of different compression-to-ventilation methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review. , 2017, Resuscitation.

[25]  Mohammed T Ansari,et al.  The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  Alonso Carrasco-Labra,et al.  GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[29]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[30]  G. Guyatt,et al.  World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  R. Neumar,et al.  Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[32]  L. Morrison,et al.  Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Management of Conflicts of Interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Circulation.

[33]  L. Morrison,et al.  Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[34]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  R. Neumar,et al.  Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2015, Circulation.

[36]  D. Moher,et al.  Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[38]  L. Morrison,et al.  The formula for survival in resuscitation. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[39]  Elie A Akl,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  Howard Balshem,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[41]  J. Nolan,et al.  Conflict of Interest Management Before, During, and After the 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations , 2005, Circulation.

[42]  M. Shuster,et al.  Part 4: Conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[43]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[44]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .