An Idea Ontology for Innovation Management

Exchanging and analyzing ideas across different software tools and repositories is needed to implement the concepts of open innovation and holistic innovation management. However, a precise and formal definition for the concept of an idea is hard to obtain. In this paper, we introduce an ontology to represent ideas. This ontology provides a common language to foster interoperability between tools and to support the idea life cycle. Through the use of an ontology additional benefits like semantic reasoning and automatic analysis become available. Our proposed ontology captures both a core idea concept that covers the 'heart of the idea' and further concepts to support collaborative idea development, including rating, discussing, tagging, and grouping ideas. This modular approach allows the idea ontology to be complemented by additional concepts like customized evaluation methods. We present a case study that demonstrates how the ontology can be used to achieve interoperability between innovation tools and to answer questions relevant for innovation managers that demonstrate the advantages of semantic reasoning. Introduction What is an idea? How does it relate to an innovation? While people may have an intuitive understanding of what these terms mean, there is no accepted precise and formal definition for the concept of an idea. As holistic innovation management and, in particular, the concept of open innovation gains traction, it becomes increasingly important to close this gap: a commonly agreed concept of an idea would support exchanging and analyzing ideas across different idea platforms and innovation tools, and hence be the basis to realize the vision of open innovation In this paper, we provide our own definition of the concept of an " idea " and introduce an ontology to represent ideas. Our research was motivated by the observation that various innovation management systems implement the concept of an idea based on similar core concepts but also distinct features. The goal is to capture the common core of different approaches to facilitate reuse and better integration. We also want to allow modular extensions required for the needs of specific innovation tools. Hence, we present a core idea concept that is enriched by concepts required to deal with ideas, e.g. of ideas. Thereby, we also illustrate how the Idea Ontology can be complemented by further concepts like customized evaluation methods. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: first, we study the challenges that arise as a result of recent trends in …

[1]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[2]  F. Piller,et al.  Reducing the Risks of New Product , 2006 .

[3]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[4]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[5]  J. Fairbank,et al.  Motivating Creativity and Enhancing Innovation through Employee Suggestion System Technology , 2001 .

[6]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  A Framework for Analysing Service Ecosystem Capabilities to Innovate , 2009, ECIS.

[8]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Role Models for Radical Innovations in Times of Open Innovation , 2007 .

[9]  Gottfried Vossen,et al.  Ontology Engineering from a Database Perspective , 2005, ASIAN.

[10]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation , 2008 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[12]  V. R. Benjamins,et al.  Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse Components: Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[13]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference , 2009 .

[14]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[15]  William E. Spangler,et al.  Motivating creativity through a computer-mediated employee suggestion management system , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Cristiano Longo,et al.  A Lightweight Ontology for Rating Assessments , 2007, SWAP.

[17]  F. Piller,et al.  Reducing the risks of new product development , 2006 .

[18]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  On-To-Knowledge: Semantic Web-Enabled Knowledge Management , 2003 .

[19]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration , 2002 .

[20]  Adam Mathes,et al.  Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata , 2004 .

[21]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .

[22]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Reusing ontologies and language components for ontology generation , 2010, Data Knowl. Eng..

[23]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Reasoning and change management in modular ontologies , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..

[24]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[25]  Christoph Riedl,et al.  Service Innovation in Business Value Networks , 2008 .

[26]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantics for the Semantic Web: The Implicit, the Formal and the Powerful , 2005, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[27]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[28]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[29]  Steffen Koch,et al.  Strategic Innovation Management on the Basis of Searching and Mining Press Releases , 2009, WEBIST.

[30]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[31]  Clemens van Dinther,et al.  Service Innovation with Information Markets , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[32]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[34]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[35]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[36]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Semantic innovation management across the extended enterprise , 2006 .

[37]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[38]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[39]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[40]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[41]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[42]  Edward W. Davis,et al.  Extended Enterprise , 2003, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.