Comparison of Polar® RS800G3™ heart rate monitor with Polar® S810i™ and electrocardiogram to obtain the series of RR intervals and analysis of heart rate variability at rest

The Polar® RS800G3™ rate monitor was released in the market to replace the Polar® S810i™, and few studies have assessed that the RR series obtained by this equipment is reliable for analysis of heart rate variability (HRV). We compared HRV indexes among the devices Polar® RS800G3™, Polar® S810i™ and eletrocardiogram (ECG) to know whether the series of Polar® RS800G3™ are as reliable as those devices already validated. We analysed data from 30 healthy young adults, male, with an average age of 20·66 ± 1·40 years, which had captured the heart rate beat to beat in the three devices simultaneously with spontaneously breathing, first in the supine position and subsequently sit both for 30 min. The obtained series of RR intervals was used to calculate the indexes of HRV in the time domain (SDNN and RMSSD) and in the frequency domain (LF, HF and LF/HF). There were no significant differences in HRV indexes calculated from series obtained by the three devices, regardless of the position analysed, and a high correlation coefficient was observed. The results suggest that the Polar® RS800G3™ is able to capture series of RR intervals for analysis of HRV indexes as reliable as those obtained by ECG and Polar® S810i™.

[1]  Mika P. Tarvainen,et al.  Software for advanced HRV analysis , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[2]  F. Gamelin,et al.  Validity of the polar S810 heart rate monitor to measure R-R intervals at rest. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei,et al.  Basic notions of heart rate variability and its clinical applicability. , 2009, Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular.

[4]  M Kingsley,et al.  Comparison of Polar 810s and an ambulatory ECG system for RR interval measurement during progressive exercise. , 2005, International journal of sports medicine.

[5]  L. Porto,et al.  Comparison of Time‐Domain Short‐Term Heart Interval Variability Analysis Using a Wrist‐Worn Heart Rate Monitor and the Conventional Electrocardiogram , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  N. Tordi,et al.  L’utilisation d’un nouveau système d’enregistrement de fréquence cardiaque battement à battement pour l’analyse traditionnelle de variabilité de fréquence cardiaque , 2007 .

[7]  V. Bricout,et al.  Analyses of heart rate variability in young soccer players: The effects of sport activity , 2010, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[8]  C. M. Pastre,et al.  Comparison of the Polar S810i monitor and the ECG for the analysis of heart rate variability in the time and frequency domains. , 2008, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[9]  Barbara Canlon,et al.  Possibilities and limitations of the polar RS800 in measuring heart rate variability at rest , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[10]  Matthias Weippert,et al.  Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R–R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[11]  Aparecida Maria Catai,et al.  Avaliação da modulação autonômica da freqüência cardíaca nas posturas supina e sentada de homens jovens sedentários , 2008 .

[12]  David Nunan,et al.  Levels of agreement for RR intervals and short-term heart rate variability obtained from the Polar S810 and an alternative system , 2008, European Journal of Applied Physiology.