Price Competition Based on Relative Prices

We consider price competition models for oligopolistic markets, in which the consumer reacts to relative rather than absolute prices, where the relative price is defined as the difference between the absolute price and a given reference value. Such settings arise, for example, when the full retail price earned by the 'retailer' is reduced by virtue of a third party offering a subsidy or a rebate or in prospect theoretical models in which customers establish a reference price and base their choices on the differentials with respect to the reference price. When choosing among the various competing options, the consumer trades off the net price paid with various other product or service attributes, as in standard price competition models. The reference price may be exogenously specified and pre-announced to the competing firms. Alternatively, it may be endogenously determined, as a function of the set of absolute prices selected by the competing firms, for example the lowest or the second lowest price.We review five different application areas where the above model structure arises. We then characterize the equilibrium behavior under a general reference value scheme of the above type; this in a base model, where we assume that the consumer choice model is of the general MultiNomialLogit (MNL) type. We also derive comparison results for the price equilibria that arise under alternative subsidy schemes. These comparisons have important implications for the design of subsidy schemes.

[1]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Analytics for an Online Retailer: Demand Forecasting and Price Optimization , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[2]  Liran Einav,et al.  MANAGED COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE , 2015 .

[3]  A. Rivlin,et al.  Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare? , 2015, Forum for Health Economics & Policy.

[4]  M. Peitz,et al.  Competition under Consumer Loss Aversion , 2014 .

[5]  Georgia Perakis,et al.  The Impact of Demand Uncertainty on Consumer Subsidies for Green Technology Adoption , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[6]  M. Landrum,et al.  Competitive bidding in Medicare: who benefits from competition? , 2012, The American journal of managed care.

[7]  D. Cutler,et al.  Potential consequences of reforming Medicare into a competitive bidding system. , 2012, JAMA.

[8]  Linda J Cahn How to combat Pharma's costly coupon programs. , 2012, Managed care.

[9]  H. Aaron,et al.  Why now is not the time for premium support. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Antos The Wyden-Ryan proposal--a foundation for realistic Medicare reform. , 2012, New England Journal of Medicine.

[11]  Hongmin Li,et al.  Pricing Multiple Products with the Multinomial Logit and Nested Logit Models: Concavity and Implications , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[12]  R. Spiegler Bounded Rationality and Industrial Organization , 2011 .

[13]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Do Switching Costs Make Markets Less Competitive? , 2008 .

[14]  Joshua Lustig The Welfare Effects of Adverse Selection in Privatized Medicare , 2008 .

[15]  B. Kőszegi,et al.  Competition and Price Variation When Consumers Are Loss Averse , 2008 .

[16]  Jidong Zhou,et al.  Reference Dependence and Market Competition , 2008 .

[17]  A. Hall The Value of Medicare Managed Care Plans and Their Prescription Drug Benefits , 2007 .

[18]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[19]  S. Raj,et al.  Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions , 2005 .

[20]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Bertrand Supertraps , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Felix Schlenk,et al.  Proof of Theorem 3 , 2005 .

[22]  Fernando Bernstein,et al.  A General Equilibrium Model for Industries with Price and Service Competition , 2004, Oper. Res..

[23]  B. Dowd,et al.  The effect of health plan characteristics on Medicare+ Choice enrollment. , 2003, Health services research.

[24]  Purushottam Papatla,et al.  An Investigation of Reference Price Segments , 2000 .

[25]  D. Bell,et al.  Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity , 2000 .

[26]  J. Antos,et al.  Medicare Reform: Obstacles and Options , 1999 .

[27]  Füsun F. Gönül,et al.  A method to infer coupon availability from coupon redemption in the supermarket scanner panel data , 1999 .

[28]  D. M. Topkis Supermodularity and Complementarity , 1998 .

[29]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  A comparative analysis of reference price models , 1997 .

[30]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice , 1997 .

[31]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[33]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction. , 1987 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[35]  Josef Hadar A NOTE ON DOMINANT DIAGONALS IN STABILITY ANALYSIS , 1965 .

[36]  Robert Phillips,et al.  Price Competition with the Attraction Demand Model: Existence of Unique Equilibrium and Its Stability , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[37]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Bounded Rationality in Industrial Organization , 2006 .

[38]  X. Vives Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools , 1999 .

[39]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Aggregation and Imperfect Competition: On the Existence of Equilibrium , 1991 .

[40]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[41]  R. Varga,et al.  Proof of Theorem 4 , 1983 .

[42]  R. Varga,et al.  Proof of Theorem 2 , 1983 .