Online Communities: researching sociability and usability in hard to reach populations

Thousands of social gatherings - online communities – occur via ICTs across the Internet. They use listservers, bulletin boards, instant messaging, blogs, social network and meeting facilitation systems and purpose-build platforms. Each community is the product of a complex set of interacting variables. Some of these variables come from usability of the software but social factors have a strong influence. Direct cause and effect relationships are often difficult to tease out and identifying criteria for successful online communities can be difficult. Furthermore several disciplines own this topic, each with its own theories, research methods, community of researchers and publication outlets. This is good for multidisciplinary research but it can be challenging. In this paper I discuss two research projects. Each focuses on community populations that are hard to reach. The first analyses why people do not actively participate in online discussions, i.e., lurk. The second is a new project to develop cross-cultural online book communities for children across the world who do not speak each other’s languages. I present the key findings from each project and suggest ways of working with these hard to reach populations.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[3]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online Lurkers Tell Why , 2004, AMCIS.

[4]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[5]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community , 2005, TCHI.

[6]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[7]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[8]  Sara Kiesler Culture of the Internet , 1997 .

[9]  Allison Druin,et al.  The role of children in the design of new technology , 2002 .

[10]  Allison Druin,et al.  The design of children's technology , 1998 .

[11]  Allison Druin,et al.  When are Personal Technologies for Children? , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[12]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[13]  J. Preece,et al.  History of online communities , 2003 .

[14]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Designing and evaluating online communities: research speaks to emerging practice , 2004, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[15]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[16]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Electronic Survey Methodology: A Case Study in Reaching Hard-to-Involve Internet Users , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[19]  B. Wellman An electronic group is virtually a social network. , 1997 .

[20]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[21]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Etiquette online: from nice to necessary , 2004, CACM.

[22]  A. Druin What Children Can Teach Us: Developing Digital Libraries for Children with Children1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.