Feasibility Study to Identify Machine Learning Predictors for a Virtual School Environment: Virtual Reality Stroop Task

An adaptive virtual school environment can offer cognitive assessments (e.g., Virtual Classroom Stroop Task) with user-specific distraction levels that mimic the conditions found in a student’s actual classroom. Former iterations of the virtual reality classroom Stroop tasks did not adapt to user performance in the face of distractors. While advances in virtual reality-based assessments provide potential for increasing assessment of cognitive processes, less has been done to develop these simulations into personalized virtual environments for improved assessment. An adaptive virtual school environment offers the potential for dynamically adapting the difficulty level (e.g., level and amount of distractors) specific to the user’s performance. This study aimed to identify machine learning predictors that could be utilized for cognitive performance classifiers, from participants (N = 60) using three classification techniques: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN). Participants were categorized into either high performing or low performing categories based upon their average calculated throughput performance on tasks assessing their attentional processes during a distraction condition. The predictors for the classifiers used the average cognitive response time and average motor response dwell time (amount of time response button was pressed) for each section of the virtual reality-based Stroop task totaling 24 predictors. Using 10-fold cross validation during the training of the classifiers, revealed that the SVM (86.7%) classifier was the most robust classifier followed by Naïve Bayes (81.7%) and KNN (76.7%) for identifying cognitive performance. Results from the classifiers suggests that we can use average response time and dwell time as predictors to adapt the social cues and distractors in the environment to the appropriate difficulty level for the user.

[1]  U. Díaz-Orueta,et al.  AULA—Advanced Virtual Reality Tool for the Assessment of Attention , 2016, Journal of attention disorders.

[2]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[3]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  The stroop task : the «Gold Standard» of attentional measures , 1992 .

[4]  Joseph S. Raiker,et al.  Is hyperactivity ubiquitous in ADHD or dependent on environmental demands? Evidence from meta-analysis. , 2016, Clinical psychology review.

[5]  Michael J. Kofler,et al.  Quantifying ADHD classroom inattentiveness, its moderators, and variability: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  Todd Bowerly,et al.  A Virtual Reality Scenario for All Seasons: The Virtual Classroom , 2009, CNS Spectrums.

[7]  Steven P Reise,et al.  Item response theory and clinical measurement. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[8]  Thomas D Parsons,et al.  Virtual environments as an assessment modality with pediatric ASD populations: a brief report , 2018, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[9]  C. Huang-Pollock,et al.  Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: a meta-analysis of CPT performance. , 2012, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  D. Thorne,et al.  Throughput: A simple performance index with desirable characteristics , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[11]  M. Lamar,et al.  Marrying Past and Present Neuropsychology: Is the Future of the Process-Based Approach Technology-Based? , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[12]  D. Algom,et al.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.

[13]  T. Parsons,et al.  Bimodal Virtual Reality Stroop for Assessing Distractor Inhibition in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2016, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[14]  Antara Majumdar,et al.  Music and Video as Distractors for Boys with ADHD in the Classroom: Comparison with Controls, Individual Differences, and Medication Effects , 2011, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[15]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[16]  Joseph S. Raiker,et al.  Reaction time variability in ADHD: a meta-analytic review of 319 studies. , 2013, Clinical psychology review.

[17]  T. Parsons,et al.  A Comparison of Virtual Reality Classroom Continuous Performance Tests to Traditional Continuous Performance Tests in Delineating ADHD: a Meta-Analysis , 2019, Neuropsychology Review.

[18]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. , 2008, Psychiatric services.

[19]  Pierre Nolin,et al.  Assessment of executive function in adolescence: A comparison of traditional and virtual reality tools , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Ellen Frank,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Diagnosis and Testing of Mental Health Disorders. , 2016, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[21]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .