Changes in acoustic features and their conjunctions are processed by separate neuronal populations

We investigated the relationship between the neuronal populations involved in detecting change in two acoustic features and their conjunction. Equivalent current dipole (ECD) models of the magnetic mismatch negativity (MMNm) generators were calculated for infrequent changes in pitch, perceived sound source location, and the conjunction of these two features. All of these three changes elicited MMNms that were generated in the vicinity of auditory cortex. The location of the ECD best describing the MMNm to the conjunction deviant was anterior to those for the MMNm responses elicited by either one of the constituent features. The present data thus suggest that at least partially separate neuronal populations are involved in detecting change in acoustic features and feature conjunctions.

[1]  G. Karmos,et al.  Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential , 1996, Brain Research.

[2]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Processing of complex sounds in the macaque nonprimary auditory cortex. , 1995, Science.

[3]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation , 1994, Brain Research.

[4]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Analogous neural models for tactual and visual learning , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R Hari,et al.  Neuromagnetic mismatch fields to single and paired tones. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Alho.  Cerebral Generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Its Magnetic Counterpart (MMNm) Elicited by Sound Changes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[7]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interaction between representations of different features of auditory sensory memory. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[8]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity--the measure for central sound representation accuracy. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[9]  R Hari,et al.  Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  W. Ritter,et al.  Feature conjunctions and auditory sensory memory , 1998, Brain Research.

[11]  J. Rauschecker.  Parallel Processing in the Auditory Cortex of Primates , 1998, Audiology and Neurotology.

[12]  I. Winkler,et al.  Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  F. Perrin,et al.  Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Keiji Tanaka.  Mechanisms of visual object recognition: monkey and human studies , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of complex sounds in the human auditory cortex as revealed by magnetic brain responses. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Storage of feature conjunctions in transient auditory memory. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[19]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.