Assessment of a novel 32-channel phased array for cardiovascular hybrid PET/MRI imaging: MRI performance

Cardiovascular imaging using hybrid positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires a radio frequency phased array resonator capable of high acceleration factors in order to achieve the shortest breath-holds while maintaining optimal MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and minimum PET photon attenuation. To our knowledge, the only two arrays used today for hybrid PET/MRI cardiovascular imaging are either incapable of achieving high acceleration or affect the PET photon count greatly. This study is focused on the evaluation of the MRI performance of a novel third-party prototype 32-channel phased array designed for simultaneous PET/MRI cardiovascular imaging. The study compares the quality parameters of MRI parallel imaging, such as g-factor, noise correlation coefficients, and SNR, to the conventional arrays (mMR 12-channel and MRI-only 32-channel) currently used with hybrid PET/MRI systems. The quality parameters of parallel imaging were estimated for multiple acceleration factors on a phantom and three healthy volunteers. Using a Germanium-68 (Ge-68) phantom, preliminary measurements of PET photon attenuation caused by the novel array were briefly compared to the photon counts produced from no-array measurements. The global mean of the g-factor and SNRg produced by the novel 32-channel PET/MRI array were better than those produced by the MRI-only 32-channel array by 5% or more. The novel array has resulted in MRI SNR improvements of > 30% at all acceleration factors, in comparison to the mMR12-channel array. Preliminary evaluation of PET transparency showed less than 5% photon attenuation caused by both anterior and posterior parts of the novel array. The MRI performance of the novel PET/MRI 32-channel array qualifies it to be a viable alternative to the conventional arrays for cardiovascular hybrid PET/MRI. A detailed evaluation of the novel array’s PET performance remains to be conducted, but cursory assessment promises significantly reduced attenuation.

[1]  H. Quick,et al.  Hybrid cardiac imaging using PET/MRI: a joint position statement by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) , 2018, European Radiology.

[2]  Bernd J. Pichler,et al.  PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results , 2008, European Radiology.

[3]  Yi Su,et al.  Attenuation Effects of MR Headphones During Brain PET/MR Studies , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[4]  Jinsong Ouyang,et al.  Quantitative simultaneous positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2014, Journal of medical imaging.

[5]  Armin Kolb,et al.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging? , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[6]  O. Rimoldi,et al.  Stunning, Hibernation, and Assessment of Myocardial Viability , 2008, Circulation.

[7]  K. Bolwin,et al.  PET attenuation correction for flexible MRI surface coils in hybrid PET/MRI using a 3D depth camera , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac CINE MR imaging with a 32‐channel cardiac coil and parallel imaging: Impact of acceleration factors on image quality and volumetric accuracy , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  A 31‐channel MR brain array coil compatible with positron emission tomography , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Technical and instrumentational foundations of PET/MRI. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[11]  E M Haacke,et al.  Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid. , 1990, Radiology.

[12]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Integrated PET/MR imaging: automatic attenuation correction of flexible RF coils. , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  Axel Haase,et al.  A 16-channel MR coil for simultaneous PET/MR imaging in breast cancer , 2015, European Radiology.

[14]  D. Sodickson,et al.  Comprehensive quantification of signal‐to‐noise ratio and g‐factor for image‐based and k‐space‐based parallel imaging reconstructions , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Gudrun Wagenknecht,et al.  MRI for attenuation correction in PET: methods and challenges , 2012, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[16]  Christina Triantafyllou,et al.  A 128‐channel receive‐only cardiac coil for highly accelerated cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[19]  Lawrence L Wald,et al.  Design and evaluation of a 32‐channel phased‐array coil for lung imaging with hyperpolarized 3‐helium , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Martin Rajchl,et al.  Active Cardiac Sarcoidosis: First Clinical Experience of Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography–Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Disease , 2013, Circulation.

[21]  H. Quick,et al.  Simultaneous PET/MR imaging: MR-based attenuation correction of local radiofrequency surface coils. , 2012, Medical physics.

[22]  Harald H Quick,et al.  Simultaneous PET/MR imaging: MR-based attenuation correction of local radiofrequency surface coils. , 2012, Medical physics.

[23]  David Faul,et al.  Technical Note: Comparison of megavoltage, dual‐energy, and single‐energy CT‐based μ‐maps for a four‐channel breast coil in PET/MRI , 2017, Medical physics.

[24]  D. Townsend,et al.  Method for transforming CT images for attenuation correction in PET/CT imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[25]  H H Quick,et al.  The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study. , 2011, Medical physics.

[26]  Charalampos Tsoumpas,et al.  Markerless attenuation correction for carotid MRI surface receiver coils in combined PET/MR imaging. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Effects of MR surface coils on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[29]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Felix Nensa,et al.  Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives. , 2014, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[32]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  PET/MRI for Neurologic Applications , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.