Differential Grading Standards Revisited
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Donald E. Schmidt,et al. Grading Practices in Different Major Fields , 1974 .
[2] R. Goldman,et al. Adaptation-Level as an Explanation for Differential Standards in College Grading. , 1975 .
[3] R. Goldman,et al. Assertion Training for Mental Health Paraprofessionals. , 1976 .
[4] R. Goldman,et al. The Scholastic Aptitude Test "Explains" Why College Men Major In Science More Often Than College Women. , 1976 .
[5] Roy D. Goldman,et al. Why College Grade Point Average is Difficult to Predict. , 1976 .
[6] R. Goldman,et al. A Within-Subjects Technique for Comparing College Grading Standards: Implications in the Validity of the Evaluation of College Achievement , 1976 .
[7] A. Jensen,et al. Bias in Mental Testing , 1981 .
[8] Donald E. Powers. Long-Term Predictive and Construct Validity of Two Traditional Predictors of Law School Performance. , 1982 .
[9] Relationship of Elementary and Secondary School Achievement Test Scores to College Performance , 1983 .
[10] Robert L. Linn,et al. A META ANALYSIS OF THE VALIDITY OF PREDICTORS OF PERFORMANCE IN LAW SCHOOL , 1984 .
[11] Further Comment: Yes, the SAT Does Help Colleges , 1985 .
[12] Does the SAT Help Colleges Make Better Selection Decisions , 1985 .
[13] Yes, the SAT Does Help Colleges. , 1985 .
[14] David Owen,et al. None of the Above: Behind the Myth of Scholastic Aptitude , 1985 .