Against Their Apparent Self-Interest: The Authorization of Independent State Legislative Ethics Commissions, 1973–96

Why do state legislators enact policies that conflict with their immediate self-interest? I address this question by assessing the impact of traditional and non-traditional policy determinants on ethics policy adoption. Specifically, I use event history analysis to identify the factors that explain the authorization of independent state legislative ethics commissions from 1973 to 1996. I find that the determinants of ethics policy are substantially, but not completely, different from those of other policies, with ethics policy fitting into an agenda-setting model better than many other policies. Scandals and the actions of other states played a prominent role in setting the agenda and facilitating the authorization of ethics commissions. The agenda-setting process transforms the immediate self-interest of legislators on this issue from one of concern about their own economic well being to one of concern about re-election. In addition, political culture, institutional power arrangements, legislative compensation, and party competition had small but discernible effects on the likelihood of a state establishing a legislative ethics commission.

[1]  Gregory B. Markus,et al.  Analyzing panel data , 1979 .

[2]  M. Mccann Taking Reform Seriously: Perspectives on Public Interest Liberalism , 1986 .

[3]  K. Wald,et al.  Morality Politics vs. Political Economy: The Case of School‐Based Health Centers , 2001 .

[4]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[5]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[6]  T. Dye,et al.  Politics, economics, and the public : policy outcomes in the American States , 1968 .

[7]  C. Barrilleaux,et al.  Deservingness, Discretion, and the State Politics of Welfare Spending, 1990–96 , 2003, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[8]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[9]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[10]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy , 2002 .

[11]  R. Wiebe The Search for Order, 1877-1920 , 1966 .

[12]  G. Thompson,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[13]  Donald P. Haider-Markel,et al.  Policy Diffusion as a Geographical Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s , 2001, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[14]  Michael Boss Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[15]  Jeffrey M. Berry,et al.  The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups , 1999 .

[16]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[17]  R. E. Weber Presidential Address: The Quality of State Legislative Representation: A Critical Assessment , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[18]  S. Skowronek,et al.  Power and Society: Greater New York at the Turn of the Century@@@Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 , 1984 .

[19]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[20]  A. Rosenthal Drawing the Line: Legislative Ethics in the States , 1997 .

[21]  Tom Loftus,et al.  The art of legislative politics , 1994 .

[22]  A. Alexandroff Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 Stephen Skowronek Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. x, 389 , 1983, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[23]  J. Clark Congressional Salaries and the Politics of Unpopular Votes , 1996 .

[24]  Peter E. Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[25]  James C. Clingermayer,et al.  Disentangling Patterns of State Debt Financing , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[26]  Stephen Horn,et al.  Congressional ethics: The view from the House , 1975 .

[27]  Brian F. Schaffner,et al.  The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[28]  A. Maass U.S. Prosecution of State and Local Officials for Political Corruption: Is the Bureaucracy Out of Control in a High-Stakes Operation Involving the Constitutional System? , 1987 .

[29]  C. Beard,et al.  An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States , 1913 .

[30]  John B. Willett,et al.  It’s About Time: Using Discrete-Time Survival Analysis to Study Duration and the Timing of Events , 1993 .

[31]  S. Tolchin,et al.  Glass Houses: Congressional Ethics And The Politics Of Venom , 2001 .

[32]  D. Black The theory of committees and elections , 1959 .

[33]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[34]  Sandra Williams Conflict of Interest: The Ethical Dilemma in Politics , 1985 .

[35]  William D. Berry,et al.  Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity , 1992 .

[36]  C. Mooney,et al.  Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform , 1995 .

[37]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  Electoral Competition in the American States , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Virginia Gray,et al.  External Limits and Internal Determinants of State Public Policy , 1991 .

[39]  C. McDanal Ethics in Congress , 1994 .

[40]  A. Downs Up and Down with Ecology--The Issue Attention Cycle , 1972 .

[41]  R. L. Savage,et al.  Policy Innovativeness as a Trait of American States , 1978, The Journal of Politics.

[42]  Robert C. Lowry,et al.  Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[43]  R. E. Dawson,et al.  Inter-Party Competition, Economic Variables, and Welfare Policies in the American States , 1963, The Journal of Politics.

[44]  H. Chappell Conflict of interest and congressional voting: A note , 1981 .

[45]  C. Barrilleaux,et al.  The Political Economy of State Medicaid Policy , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[46]  M. Fiorina Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism? , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[47]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  The Role of Agenda Setting in Policy Innovation , 1997 .

[48]  K. Hill,et al.  Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Policy Linkages , 1995 .

[49]  Andrew S. Mcfarland Public interest lobbies : decision-making on energy , 1976 .

[50]  Robert,et al.  An Age of Reform , 1969 .

[51]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[52]  Suzanne Garment Scandal : the crisis of mistrust in American politics , 1992 .

[53]  Benjamin G. Bishin Constituency Influence in Congress: Does Subconstituency Matter? , 2000 .

[54]  K. Meier The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol and Public Policy , 1994 .

[55]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[56]  C. Mooney,et al.  The Temporal Diffusion of Morality Policy: The Case of Death Penalty Legislation in the American States , 1999 .