Towards a Theoretical Framework to Explain Root Causes of Errors in Manually Acquired Data

The aim of this paper is to investigate how organisations can improve the quality of their manually acquired data. This is achieved by adopting a grounded theory approach to analyse findings from an exploratory case study. The study concludes that organisations can improve the quality of their manually acquired data by increasing the intention of the data producers to input data of good quality and/or by improving the tasktechnology fit. This work contributes to the literature in two ways. First, we refine the theory of planned behaviour so that it can serve as a basis for initiatives to improve the quality of manually acquired data. Second, our theoretical framework demonstrates that the task-technology fit construct can not only be used to explain how the errors in the output of an information system affect the performance of a task for which this output is used, but is also relevant to explain some of the root causes of errors in the input of an information system.

[1]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  The Grounded Theory Method and Case Study Data in IS Research: Issues and Design , 2005 .

[3]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[4]  Glen D. Murphy,et al.  Improving the quality of manually acquired data: Applying the theory of planned behaviour to data quality , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Jack E. Olson,et al.  Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension , 2003 .

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[8]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[9]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[10]  Bart Baesens,et al.  A multidimensional analysis of data quality for credit risk management: New insights and challenges , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems , 1985 .

[12]  Anany Levitin,et al.  A model of the data (life) cycles with application to quality , 1993, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[13]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[14]  Maydanchik Arkady,et al.  Data Quality Assessment , 2008 .

[15]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Knowing-Why About Data Processes and Data Quality , 2004 .

[16]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[18]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .