Does the Human Dorsal Stream Really Process a Category for Tools?

Previously, Almeida et al. (2008) used a technique called Continuous Flash Suppression to show that human dorsal stream cortical areas specifically responded to a “tool category.” Here, we used the same technique to clarify what attributes of tools are processed in the dorsal stream. We examined surface attributes and shape. A significant priming effect was found when we removed surface attributes by using line drawings instead of photographs. In a second experiment, we manipulated shape and we found that there were no significant priming effects when we used nonelongated tool pictures as tool prime stimuli. To better clarify the effect of shape attributes on priming effects, we conducted a further experiment using elongated stick-like rectangles as prime stimuli and found that elongated shapes significantly shortened the reaction time to the tool pictures as target stimuli. Additionally, when elongated vegetables were used as prime stimuli, the reaction time to the tool pictures as target stimuli was also significantly shortened, but there was no effect when stubby vegetables were used. Finally, when we controlled for orientation by presenting rotated elongated stick-like rectangles, diamond shapes, and cut circles as prime stimuli, we found that rectangles replicated the same significant priming effect as previous experiments, but the others did not. These results suggest that the dorsal stream processes elongated shapes but does not process the tool category specifically.

[1]  M. Goodale,et al.  Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision , 2004 .

[2]  Sheng He,et al.  Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  The Role of the Dorsal Visual Processing Stream in Tool Identification , 2010, Psychological science.

[5]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Closely overlapping responses to tools and hands in left lateral occipitotemporal cortex. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  G. Fink,et al.  REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[8]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[9]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Gross,et al.  Topographical organization of cortical afferents to extrastriate visual area PO in the macaque: A dual tracer study , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Shape selectivity in primate lateral intraparietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[13]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[14]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The Representation of Tools in Left Parietal Cortex Is Independent of Visual Experience , 2010, Psychological science.

[15]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Observing Learned Object-specific Functional Grasps Preferentially Activates the Ventral Stream , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: evidence from FMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Eric Achten,et al.  Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: Effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  F. Fang,et al.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Goodale Transforming vision into action , 2011, Vision Research.

[24]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.