Unstable Memories Create a High-Level Representation that Enables Learning Transfer

A memory is unstable, making it susceptible to interference and disruption, after its acquisition [1-4]. The function or possible benefit of a memory being unstable at its acquisition is not well understood. Potentially, instability may be critical for the communication between recently acquired memories, which would allow learning in one task to be transferred to the other subsequent task [1, 5]. Learning may be transferred between any memories that are unstable, even between different types of memory. Here, we test the link between a memory being unstable and the transfer of learning to a different type of memory task. We measured how learning in one task transferred to and thus improved learning in a subsequent task. There was transfer from a motor skill to a word list task and, vice versa, from a word list to a motor skill task. What was transferred was a high-level relationship between elements, rather than knowledge of the individual elements themselves. Memory instability was correlated with subsequent transfer, suggesting that transfer was related to the instability of the memory. Using different methods, we stabilized the initial memory, preventing it from being susceptible to interference, and found that these methods consistently prevented transfer to the subsequent memory task. This suggests that the transfer of learning across diverse tasks is due to a high-level representation that can only be formed when a memory is unstable. Our work has identified an important function of memory instability.

[1]  R. Seidler Multiple Motor Learning Experiences Enhance Motor Adaptability , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Dorothy Tse,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S5 Tables S1 to S3 Electron Impact (ei) Mass Spectra Chemical Ionization (ci) Mass Spectra References Schemas and Memory Consolidation Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles , 2022 .

[3]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Current concepts in procedural consolidation , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[5]  E. Robertson,et al.  Preventing interference between different memory tasks , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Stern,et al.  An fMRI Study of the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning , 2003, Neuron.

[7]  Daniel T Willingham,et al.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Involved in Transfer of Procedural Knowledge , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  T. Stein,et al.  Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Dorothy Tse,et al.  Schema-Dependent Gene Activation and Memory Encoding in Neocortex , 2011, Science.

[10]  Sunbin Song,et al.  Sleep Does Not Benefit Probabilistic Motor Sequence Learning , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Tim Curran,et al.  Higher-Order Associative Learning in Amnesia: Evidence from the Serial Reaction Time Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning , 2011, Neuron.

[14]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Benjamin A Clegg,et al.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task , 2005, Psychological research.

[16]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Matthew P Walker,et al.  A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. , 2005, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[18]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  M. Costanzi,et al.  Memory impairment induced by an interfering task is reverted by pre-frontal cortex lesions: A possible role for an inhibitory process in memory suppression in mice , 2009, Neuroscience.

[20]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Off-line learning of motor skill memory: a double dissociation of goal and movement. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Edwin M Robertson,et al.  Off-Line Processing: Reciprocal Interactions between Declarative and Procedural Memories , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  S. C. Cramer,et al.  Reward Improves Long-Term Retention of a Motor Memory through Induction of Offline Memory Gains , 2013 .

[23]  Sunbin Song,et al.  Practice and sleep form different aspects of skill , 2014, Nature Communications.

[24]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Awareness Modifies the Skill-Learning Benefits of Sleep , 2004, Current Biology.

[25]  David L Wright,et al.  Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task , 2004, Psychological research.

[26]  E. Robertson The Serial Reaction Time Task: Implicit Motor Skill Learning? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Implicit motor-sequence learning in humans following unilateral stroke: the impact of practice and explicit knowledge , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  James H. Howard,et al.  Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  S. Wise,et al.  Neural Substrates of Intermanual Transfer of a Newly Acquired Motor Skill , 2007, Current Biology.

[30]  Edwin M Robertson,et al.  New Insights in Human Memory Interference and Consolidation , 2012, Current Biology.

[31]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Sleep-Dependent Consolidation of Contextual Learning , 2006, Current Biology.